Re: [PD] Automatic Sample Separator / possible bug in some Pd versions

2016-03-27 Thread Lucas Cordiviola
Mar 2016 13:51:36 -0700 Subject: Re: [PD] Automatic Sample Separator / possible bug in some Pd versions From: empm...@gmail.com To: lucard...@hotmail.com CC: pd-list@lists.iem.at Hi Lucarda, Thanks for the -maxsize tip. That helps a lot. Here are links to the patches: https://www.dropbox.co

Re: [PD] Automatic Sample Separator / possible bug in some Pd versions

2016-03-26 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi Lucarda, Thanks for the -maxsize tip. That helps a lot. Here are links to the patches: https://www.dropbox.com/s/87hdyuo4xi68dt6/Sample_splitter.zip?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/e7csnfwjrctsf8j/Split_test.zip?dl=0 Hope that works. Best, Chris On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Lucas Cord

Re: [PD] Automatic Sample Separator / possible bug in some Pd versions

2016-03-25 Thread Lucas Cordiviola
Hi Christopher: You can do arrays bigger than 90 sec, see [soundfiler] help, flags for reading: -resize and -maxsize. It is safe to use soundfiles shorter than 16777216 samples (around 6 min @44.1khz), this is the maximum possible integer for a 3 byte number, this is also the biggest number you

Re: [PD] Automatic Sample Separator / possible bug in some Pd versions

2016-03-25 Thread Christopher Meng
Sorry about the huge attachments. I just read the netiquette page and will use links next time. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a need for cutting up long audio files into shorter audio files to > be played as samples. That is, I'll record audio,