A few nights ago a friend stopped by with his Nikon D800. He mentioned an
interesting point, that his camera is diffraction limited at f/4. And so, it
turns out, is a Pentax K-5 (I'm using their data for a D7000 to find the
diffraction limit).
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/diffra
What settings did you put in for your calculations. I tried a bunch
of combinations, and didn't get diffraction limiting at f/4. f/8 and
up yeah, but not that low.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> A few nights ago a friend stopped by with his Nikon D800. He mentioned an
>
On Jul 1, 2012, at 2:53 PM, David Parsons wrote:
> What settings did you put in for your calculations. I tried a bunch
> of combinations, and didn't get diffraction limiting at f/4. f/8 and
> up yeah, but not that low.
Lens aperture f/4.0 airy diameter 5.3um pixel Dia 4.8um
I suspect that i
MARK!
cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Larry Colen
The more I learn about photography, and what is required to maximize the
technical quality of my photos, the more tempted I am to just
Let no diffraction limit your creativity, Larry.
On 7/2/2012 12:48 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
A few nights ago a friend stopped by with his Nikon D800. He
mentioned an interesting point, that his camera is diffraction
limited at f/4. And so, it turns out, is a Pentax K-5 (I'm using
their data for
Larry Colen wrote:
>Although I'm beginning to suspect that as resolution increases,
>diffraction and lens issues will soon render anti-aliasing as
>unneeded. If we're sampling at twice the diffraction limit, or
>the lenses resolution, do we really need an AA filter?
Probably why the Pentax Q
>Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>Although I'm beginning to suspect that as resolution increases,
>>diffraction and lens issues will soon render anti-aliasing as
>>unneeded. If we're sampling at twice the diffraction limit, or
>>the lenses resolution, do we really need an AA filter?
>
>
>Probably why th
I can see the real diffraction limits at f4 on the Q. I really need
2.8 or lower before it's hard to see.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>Although I'm beginning to suspect that as resolution increases,
>>diffraction and
Let your creativity diffract your limits!
Den 2. juli 2012 kl. 06:10 skrev Boris Liberman:
> Let no diffraction limit your creativity, Larry.
>
> On 7/2/2012 12:48 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> A few nights ago a friend stopped by with his Nikon D800. He
>> mentioned an interesting point, that his
It reminds me of the heady days of Frank using film and Focus was optional.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:27 PM, DagT wrote:
> Let your creativity diffract your limits!
>
> Den 2. juli 2012 kl. 06:10 skrev Boris Liberman:
>
>> Let no diffraction limit your creativity, Larry.
>>
>> On 7/2/2012 12:48 AM
10 matches
Mail list logo