whickersworld wrote:
w The lenses would need to be constant
w aperture f/2.8.
That would defeat the whole idea of compactness of the limited
series. But who knows, maybe Pentax will come up with a DX-like
series, covering only the APS sized CCD sensor. Then you may have
your 2.8.
Pål Jensen wrote:
May I suggest something like a 23-43/4.5 AL Limited and a 77-177/4.5 ED IF Limited. Two chrome such Limited lenses and a chrome MZ-S.
Got it, and we'll include a bonus 3-D effect, cream and a cherry. Would
that be pick-up or delivery ?
cheers,
caveman
on 7/03/03 9:54 AM, Pål Jensen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think do. Theres a hole in the common lens line-ups that needs to be filled:
the compact well built zoom. Eother zooms are consumer grade and lightweight
or they are pro grade an heavy. A niche for us landscape shooters, or simply
Stan Halpin wrote:
Good idea Pål . I agree except on the low end, I would opt for a 16-32mm/4
or an 18-35mm/4 Alternatively, we need a Limited wide angle prime in the
16-18 range. At the long end, I could nicely live with a 75-150mmm/4. I
don't know much about lens design, (basically zero,
4 matches
Mail list logo
