Sorry. Here is the correct link:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15813350
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:43 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
>
>
>> There's more than one way to get to dance on Broadway:
>>
>> ht
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
There's more than one way to get to dance on Broadway:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/manage/gallery/
Comments are appreciated.
URL takes me to the Pentax Gallery Artist Login screen.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
There's more than one way to get to dance on Broadway:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15813350
Comments are appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBS
There's more than one way to get to dance on Broadway:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/manage/gallery/
Comments are appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUB
Yes, Frank, that is how the human mind tends to work. Without catorgorizing
everything in our head has the same value. Buy catorgorizing we can separate
them out and find a particular memory more quickly, just like putting things in
different folders on your hard drive makes it easier to find a
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/27/05, Jerome Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Duh, that's obvious. It would be a doggone architectural street
portraiture. Well... that is, unless it was taken with extention tubes.
Then it woud be a macro shot
Damn. Should I use colour or b&w?
Which
frank theriault wrote:
I guess
that's just the way the human brain works: we seem to be hardwired
with this insatiable desire to pigeon-hole everything. If a category
doesn't exist to stick something into, we'll "invent" one.
I think we're hardwired that way to make it easier to find stuff.
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Spivak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27. juni 2005 09:41
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Street Dancers
As i can see it... because of the "focus
On 6/27/05, Jerome Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Duh, that's obvious. It would be a doggone architectural street
> portraiture. Well... that is, unless it was taken with extention tubes.
> Then it woud be a macro shot
Damn. Should I use colour or b&w? What about fill-flash?
cheers,
Frank,
> Well, I thought your post was going to start a discussion
> of "what street photography is, and what lenses/cameras
> we're allowed to use for it."
Ah, but it's probably best that it didn't, as I think that topic has been
beaten over the head over the past couple of weeks. Since I was lu
On 6/26/05, Jerome Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I still can't believe that folks are really trying to define
> "street photography" according to what lens is used. It's quite silly,
> actually don't buy into it, David. Call your photo whatever genre
> you'd like. If you say s
On 6/26/05, David Volkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't normally do street photography (at least I think this can be
> considered street photography but the lens is a bit on the large side
> and it was an event) but the opportunity presented itself today.
>
> http://flickr.com/photos/[EM
As i can see it... because of the "focus everywhere", the current
photo is about the boy and not the dancers... the whole top part of
the photo is very messy... everything with everyone.. nothing
separated... but the boy... anyway it's a nice photo as it is... just
may be blur a little bit the danc
Hi!
I don't normally do street photography (at least I think this can be
considered street photography but the lens is a bit on the large side
and it was an event) but the opportunity presented itself today.
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/21768115/
*Ist D, Sigma 135-400mm @ 135mm,
David Volkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/21768115/
>*Ist D, Sigma 135-400mm @ 135mm, F/9.5, and 1/500th
The kid in the lower left makes it work for me :)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On Jun 26, 2005, at 5:22 PM, David Volkert wrote:
I don't normally do street photography (at least I think this can
be considered street photography but the lens is a bit on the large
side and it was an event) but the opportunity presented itself today.
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROT
> I don't normally do street photography (at least I think
> this can be considered street photography but the lens is
> a bit on the large side and it was an event)
Personally, I still can't believe that folks are really trying to define
"street photography" according to what lens is used. It's
I don't normally do street photography (at least I think this can be
considered street photography but the lens is a bit on the large side
and it was an event) but the opportunity presented itself today.
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/21768115/
*Ist D, Sigma 135-400mm @ 135mm, F/9
18 matches
Mail list logo
