Re: PESO - Pine cones

2010-04-08 Thread Larry Colen
On 4/8/2010 10:18 AM, Larry Colen wrote: On 4/8/2010 10:11 AM, David Parsons wrote: http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/4503229610/ I took the much maligned Takumar (Bayonet) 135 f/2.5 to a local cemetery after having the lens on a shelf for about a year. Maligned? I don't like mine quite

Re: PESO - Pine cones

2010-04-08 Thread Larry Colen
On 4/8/2010 10:11 AM, David Parsons wrote: http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/4503229610/ I took the much maligned Takumar (Bayonet) 135 f/2.5 to a local cemetery after having the lens on a shelf for about a year. Maligned? I don't like mine quite as much as I did the 3.5, but it's still

Re: PESO - Pine cones

2010-04-08 Thread Jack Davis
Thought you were going to say that you had buried the lens. ;) Crisp shot from an obviously unfairly maligned lens. Jack --- On Thu, 4/8/10, David Parsons wrote: > From: David Parsons > Subject: PESO - Pine cones > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Date: Thursday, A

PESO - Pine cones

2010-04-08 Thread David Parsons
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/4503229610/ I took the much maligned Takumar (Bayonet) 135 f/2.5 to a local cemetery after having the lens on a shelf for about a year. -- Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://