On 07/03/2015 9:02 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote:
On Mar 7, 2015, at 9:51 AM, CollinB wrote:
Macro is doable with 4x5 and the right body. You will need a bag bellows and a
lens designed for close focus such as a Ysaron. Also, good front movements
will allow you to do things on film that would
On Mar 7, 2015, at 9:51 AM, CollinB wrote:
> Macro is doable with 4x5 and the right body. You will need a bag bellows and
> a lens designed for close focus such as a Ysaron. Also, good front movements
> will allow you to do things on film that would otherwise require Photoshop.
> Focus gets
On 07/03/2015 8:53 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:51 AM, CollinB wrote:
You may have to test your holder/gg accuracy with a few extra teat shots in
advance.
Well, if that's what it takes...
It is close up photography after all.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PD
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:51 AM, CollinB wrote:
> You may have to test your holder/gg accuracy with a few extra teat shots in
> advance.
Well, if that's what it takes...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Macro is doable with 4x5 and the right body. You will need a bag bellows and a
lens designed for close focus such as a Ysaron. Also, good front movements
will allow you to do things on film that would otherwise require Photoshop.
Focus gets critical here. Since film sits loosely in holders ver
On 06/03/2015 6:10 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:14, Bill wrote:
On 06/03/2015 2:29 PM, J C OConnell wrote:
LF is wonderful format, the resolution is incredible and the contact
prints are amazing, but macro is just not workable.
Macro is eminently workable, you just have to wan
On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:14, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 06/03/2015 2:29 PM, J C OConnell wrote:
>> LF is wonderful format, the resolution is incredible and the contact
>> prints are amazing, but macro is just not workable.
>
> Macro is eminently workable, you just have to want to be doing close ups of
> f
On 06/03/2015 2:29 PM, J C OConnell wrote:
LF is wonderful format, the resolution is incredible and the contact
prints are amazing, but macro is just not workable.
Macro is eminently workable, you just have to want to be doing close ups
of fairly large objects...
bill
--
PDML Pentax-D
LF is wonderful format, the resolution is incredible and the contact
prints are amazing, but macro is just not workable.
On 3/5/2015 11:14 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Dear All,
Thank you for informative and thoughtful comments. Really appreciated.
I already have 6x7 and 6x8 equipment which I oc
Dear All,
Thank you for informative and thoughtful comments. Really appreciated.
I already have 6x7 and 6x8 equipment which I occasionally use.
I will let you know if I start using a large format camera anytime soon.
Bulent
-
Macro is almost impossible due to extremely limited depth of field. If you
stick to flat objects you might have some success, but with the bellows
extended a great deal, you will have to calculate reprocity failure to get
correct exposures.
Large format lends itself best to things like portrai
On 3/4/2015 8:53 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I may be able to get a 4x5" camera with a 90mm f/8 lens.
Price aside (which is another big question mark), I have questions.
First, the reasoning:
I like macro photography most.
I am getting increasingly more able to spend time on photography.
I like sp
On 3/4/2015 8:53 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I may be able to get a 4x5" camera with a 90mm f/8 lens.
Price aside (which is another big question mark), I have questions.
First, the reasoning:
I like macro photography most.
I am getting increasingly more able to spend time on photography.
I like sp
another thing you have to deal with is exposure compensation when extending
lenses into the macro range. It varies with extension so getting
exposure correct
is a challenge.
On 3/4/2015 9:42 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I was searching for a proper, locally available 150mm lens (it is not
include
I was searching for a proper, locally available 150mm lens (it is not
included in the package) as the standard focal range.
I was thinking that the range of movements might have helped in
selectively increasing the DOF.
If that is not the case even with extreme range of movements I have to
re-cons
based on my experience with large format photography:
first of all, the larger the format, the less DOF. so macro photography
on large
format is very difficult due to narrow DOF.
focusing a 90mm F8 lens isnt that difficult with a lupe, but its
a wide angle and not really suitable for macro. Fo
I may be able to get a 4x5" camera with a 90mm f/8 lens.
Price aside (which is another big question mark), I have questions.
First, the reasoning:
I like macro photography most.
I am getting increasingly more able to spend time on photography.
I like spending "hours" to get one single beautiful im
17 matches
Mail list logo