...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Baby Birds
flidkr is working for me, but even slower than usual. UGH.
In any event, the baby bird images are interesting and very well done,
Jeffery!
Dan
On Thu
: Thursday, April 28, 2011 6:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Baby Birds
Ok its loading now.
Very nice set, but i like 2 and 3 very much
Dave
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> I came across a bird nest in a bush on Sunday. The nest was in a bush
&g
Thanks Stan I am partial to the one that shows all three, well partially
shows the third one.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Stan
Halpin
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:09 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Baby
entax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Baby Birds
Jeffery,
Those are pretty nice.
I like the camoflagued look of the photos.
It's not National Geographic pretty, but is very credible.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> I came across a bird nest
ml.net] On Behalf Of Jack
Davis
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 7:16 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Baby Birds
I think you did well considering the protective cover surrounding the nest.
The shot of both nestling is worth keeping tract of, Jeff.
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Ok its loading now.
Very nice set, but i like 2 and 3 very much
Dave
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> I came across a bird nest in a bush on Sunday. The nest was in a bush and
> was not the ideal location to get captures.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnson/5663
flidkr is working for me, but even slower than usual. UGH.
In any event, the baby bird images are interesting and very well done, Jeffery!
Dan
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:51 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> flickr is not loading for me today. Wonder if Doug moved it by mistake'
> Dave
>
> On Thu, Ap
flickr is not loading for me today. Wonder if Doug moved it by mistake'
Dave
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> I came across a bird nest in a bush on Sunday. The nest was in a bush and
> was not the ideal location to get captures.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnso
The 4th one is quite nice.
stan
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:50 PM, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> I came across a bird nest in a bush on Sunday. The nest was in a bush and
> was not the ideal location to get captures.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnson/5663090520/in/photostream
>
> http://www.fl
Jeffery,
Those are pretty nice.
I like the camoflagued look of the photos.
It's not National Geographic pretty, but is very credible.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> I came across a bird nest in a bush on Sunday. The nest was in a bush and
> was not the
I think you did well considering the protective cover surrounding the nest.
The shot of both nestling is worth keeping tract of, Jeff.
Jack
--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
> From: Jeffery Johnson
> Subject: PESO: Baby Birds
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 7:5
: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Steven Desjardins
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 6:17 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Baby Birds
Nice catch. The second and fourth ones are classic. The softness of the
unfocused branches are nicely offset by the
Nice catch. The second and fourth ones are classic. The softness of
the unfocused branches are nicely offset by the sharpness of the
birds.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> I came across a bird nest in a bush on Sunday. The nest was in a bush and
> was not the ideal lo
13 matches
Mail list logo
