onnell.com
-Original Message-
From: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tokina 28-85 3.5/4.5 ATX
>Also forgot to mention I also bought a
>tokina RMC 400mm F5.6 which is also of
>excellent++ quality. I think the
Also forgot to mention I also bought a
tokina RMC 400mm F5.6 which is also of
excellent++ quality. I think the trend is
the early 80's tokina RMC lens lineup is G O O D !!!
JCO
A french book on macro photography found that the Tokina 200/3.5 was
remarquable when used with tubes for close-ups.
Lik
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Andre,
Nope. 'T'weren't me. I have a Vivitar S1 3.5 constant aperture 24-48,
that I love. JCO's mostly a screwhead prime-guy, so I doubt it was him,
> but maybe.
Well, I guess it was JCO. What the hell do I know, anyway!
Okay, back to whatever you were doing..
Well, I guess it was JCO. What the hell do I know, anyway!
Okay, back to whatever you were doing...
-knarf
frank theriault wrote:
> Hi, Andre,
>
> Nope. 'T'weren't me. I have a Vivitar S1 3.5 constant aperture 24-48,
> that I love. JCO's mostly a screwhead prime-guy, so I doubt it was him,
Hi,
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I think the trend is
> the early 80's tokina RMC lens lineup is G O O D !!!
I agree, only flare might be a problem.
My Tokina RMC 4/25-50 is a great lens too.
Gabor
Paul wrote:
PD>
PD> From all the info I have gathered from you all and the web I'm still pretty
PD> confused as to what zoom within say 24-105 is a good one. Do I really need
PD> to go Pentax or,
Paul, do you shoot into the sun or fancy backlights? In this case go
for SMC. Tokina
Paul wrote:
PD>
PD> From all the info I have gathered from you all and the web I'm still pretty
PD> confused as to what zoom within say 24-105 is a good one. Do I really need
PD> to go Pentax or,
Paul, do you shoot into the sun or fancy backlights? In this case go
for SMC. Tokina'
7 matches
Mail list logo