See, I forever overdo themes.
I agree! I came across it and it
took me a day and a half to get
to, "Oh, what the heck" and post.
Your "eye" is still true, Ann.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 6:44 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> prefer the previous untinkered ones.
>
> ann
>
>> On
prefer the previous untinkered ones.
ann
On 4/24/2017 7:22 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
I tinkered up the attached sometime in the recent past
and I don't believe it was ever posted.(?)
C&C?
Thanks!
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1205
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PD
Thanks, Bruce!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 24, 2017, at 5:36 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> I don't recall it. Very dramatic and colourful, Jack.
>
>
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>> I tinkered up the attached sometime in the recent past
>> and I don't belie
I don't recall it. Very dramatic and colourful, Jack.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> I tinkered up the attached sometime in the recent past
> and I don't believe it was ever posted.(?)
>
> C&C?
>
> Thanks!
>
> J
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=12
Appreciate the upgrade, Dan!
Thoughtful!
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 1, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Thanks, Dan. I'll happily take; "pretty Nice." ;)
>> How do you burn down the background?
>
> IO should have sai
I have a few additional shots, but
all taken at the same patch. Are
rather stunted and difficult to separate from their background.
Will locate more a bit later.
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 1, 2015, at 12:57 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> I think it a bit forced, Jack probably better to sh
I think it a bit forced, Jack probably better to shoot some more
poppies than overwork this (that alone can mess one up)
ann
On 5/1/2015 13:27, Jack Davis wrote:
Been having a tedious time attempting to remove the glow from around this.
Not ready to attempt a new background.
For what it's w
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Thanks, Dan. I'll happily take; "pretty Nice." ;)
> How do you burn down the background?
IO should have said "quite nice" or "very nice."
To eliminate a distracting background, I have been using the Quick
Selection Tool in PhotoShop to select
Thanks, Dan. I'll happily take; "pretty Nice." ;)
How do you burn down the background?
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 11:39:14 AM
Subject: Re: Peso-Poppy Love RE-DO
I think
I think that looks pretty nice, Jack.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Been having a tedious time attempting to remove the glow from around this.
> Not ready to attempt a new background.
> For what it's worth, t
Yes, Bob as previously stated.
..and YES, there is!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 7:46:42 AM
Subject: Re: Peso-Poppy Love
Jack,
That 'electric glow' looks like a background y
Jack,
That 'electric glow' looks like a background you didn't quite darken.
I'm no photoshop expert, but isn't there a way to lasso the flowers themselves
and extinguish the background all together.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Yes, that's my intention, Bob
Yes, that's my intention, Bob!
Glad you feel the image worthy.
Thanks.
Jack
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 1, 2015, at 7:17 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
> Jack,
> Background 'glow' is distracting on a nice image.
> Take more care to eliminate the stuff at the edges of the poppies.
> Regards, Bob S
Jack,
Background 'glow' is distracting on a nice image.
Take more care to eliminate the stuff at the edges of the poppies.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Shot yesterday, 4/30. May, later, completely remove any hint of background.
> I seem to see a hint of
14 matches
Mail list logo
