Joe do you know if the 35mm/2.8 Macro is actually a Pentax design or
Tokina design?
Just curious ...
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discus
> I suspect that the 11-16 is a Tokina design, as was the 12-24. I suspect
> this in part because Pentax has announced nothing about it.
>
> I hope we see a DA 11-16. It is a constant F2.8 lens. If it is good it
> could take the place of my DA 14.
>
> Joe
>
I wouldn't be surprised if it's
Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Adam posted:
>
> A 35mm f2.8 macro, with focus clutch (Can we say 35 Limited?) and an
> 11-16 f2.8 DX. CaNikon only for now (Sucks for Sony users, who could
> really use the 11-16).
>
> I'm wondering if the latter will see a DA* version. It would make a lot
> of sense as t
Adam posted:
A 35mm f2.8 macro, with focus clutch (Can we say 35 Limited?) and an
11-16 f2.8 DX. CaNikon only for now (Sucks for Sony users, who could
really use the 11-16).
I'm wondering if the latter will see a DA* version. It would make a lot
of sense as the wide match to teh 16-50 and 50-135
Yes, a lot of sense, indeed.
And yes, the 35 macro will be out as a Limited in Pentax brand but I
expect the Pentax to be a lot more compact.
On Nov 17, 2007 6:41 PM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A 35mm f2.8 macro, with focus clutch (Can we say 35 Limited?) and an
> 11-16 f2.8 DX. CaNiko
A 35mm f2.8 macro, with focus clutch (Can we say 35 Limited?) and an
11-16 f2.8 DX. CaNikon only for now (Sucks for Sony users, who could
really use the 11-16).
I'm wondering if the latter will see a DA* version. It would make a lot
of sense as the wide match to teh 16-50 and 50-135 (which is w
6 matches
Mail list logo
