Hi p8x,
Op 23-2-2011 9:29, p8x schreef:
> Hi Ton,
>
> On 23/02/2011 4:04 PM, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
>
> *CUT*
>
>> I'm not sure if and why a 'rediscover' would send a different
>> notification but perhaps
>> you could test the approach I use to see if it works for the
>> bind-backend as well.
>>
Hi Ton,
On 23/02/2011 4:04 PM, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
*CUT*
> I'm not sure if and why a 'rediscover' would send a different
> notification but perhaps
> you could test the approach I use to see if it works for the
> bind-backend as well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ton
Thanks for the quick reply,
I am on
Hi,
Op 23-2-2011 8:54, p8x schreef:
> Hi all,
>
> After spending the day testing and mucking around I think I have
> narrowed it down slightly. On the master, I have about 77,000 domains.
> When I add a new zone to it I do the following:
>
> 1. A new zone is added to the supermaster server and a "
Hi all,
After spending the day testing and mucking around I think I have
narrowed it down slightly. On the master, I have about 77,000 domains.
When I add a new zone to it I do the following:
1. A new zone is added to the supermaster server and a "pdns_control
rediscover" is then run. The zone ap
Hi all,
I am seeing a strange issue with a large amount of zone transfers that
are happening in a short amount of time.
I am running 2 pdns servers, one as a super master and one as a super
slave. Both servers are only configured to use the Bind backend. When I
have added a large amount of zones
