Joanna Bujes wrote:
> well, wouldn't you be?
>
> Joanna
>
> At 05:50 PM 11/14/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> >"the death of Satan was a tragedy for the imagination"
> > -- Wallace Stevens
> >
> >Satan is NOT dead, 'e's just pinin' for the fjords.
Not really. I'm one hour away from
well, wouldn't you be?
Joanna
At 05:50 PM 11/14/2002 -0800, you wrote:
"the death of Satan was a tragedy for the imagination"
-- Wallace Stevens
Satan is NOT dead, 'e's just pinin' for the fjords.
Tom Walker
604 255 4812
"the death of Satan was a tragedy for the imagination"
-- Wallace Stevens
Satan is NOT dead, 'e's just pinin' for the fjords.
Tom Walker
604 255 4812
Devine, James wrote:
If CJ is Charles Januzzi (sp?), I don't equate him with Louis (LPN?)
at all. As for Satan, he doesn't exist.
"the death of Satan was a tragedy for the imagination"
-- Wallace Stevens
Title: RE: [PEN-L:32210] Aesopian Language on Maillists
cbcox writes:
> Back in the early '70s I read extensively in the exchange of polemics
> between the USSR and PRC (actually between the Central Committees of the
> two parties). In the earlier stages (before a formal break occurred),
> the
