>I wrote:> as I've argued before, Mao didn't have complete control. He had
>to respond
> > to the power and influence of CCP cadres, while the fact that his power
> was
> > originally based on a peasant revolution limited his power.
Dennis Rodman -- no, Redmond -- wrote:
>Not what the historic
others who would identify themselves as
conservative.
David Shemano
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mikalac Norman S
NSSC
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 4:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [PEN-L:5852] RE: RE: Re: Privat
At 07:58 AM 12/8/00 -0500, you wrote:
>i can't find cyber-forums with a Conservatism or Right (meaning to the
>Left of Nazism and Monarchism) perspective at the same level of erudition as
>presented in PEN-L.* do they exist?
what, the Rush Limbaugh ditto-heads don't strive for intellectual excel
thank you for your interesting comments, david.
i hope you will keep tuned to these edifying discussions at PEN-L and please
comment on my amateur questions and statements because i like to check them
out with the Left, Center and Right perspectives. part of the learning
process, as they say.
P
I am
>a practicing corporate bankruptcy attorney. (My motto is capitalism
>without
>bankruptcy is like Christianity without hell).>
>
>
Some of us here belong to the wor;d's third oldest profession and there are
legal discussions intermittwently; pitch in if you have idea. Btw, I am a
believe
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Jim Devine wrote:
> as I've argued before, Mao didn't have complete control. He had to respond
> to the power and influence of CCP cadres, while the fact that his power was
> originally based on a peasant revolution limited his power.
Not what the historical record says. Ma
At 08:18 AM 12/7/00 -0800, you wrote:
>And if one person owns literally *everything*, the way that, say, Mao
>Zedong once owned mainland China through that Absolutist-style holding
>company otherwise known as the CCP?
as I've argued before, Mao didn't have complete control. He had to respond
to
At 05:20 PM 12/6/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Let me generally answer the questions as follows. The issue, from my
>perspective, is not whether property is "private" in the sense you seem to
>be asking, or whether rather metaphysical notions of freedom and consent
>can exist under capitalism. Not th
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, David Shemano wrote:
> space begins. "Private property" is my shorthand for saying the rules will
> provide that with respect to any specific resource, commodity, etc., a
> single individual gets to decide issues of possession, use and transfer.
And if one person owns litera
If you
>believe that there is something inherently noble in democratic decision
>making regardless of the results of the decision making, then you have
>chosen an end which I do not share.
>
We have a fundamental disagreement, then, david. I think that democratic
decisionmaking, including wron
>>
Let me generally answer the questions as follows. The issue, from my
perspective, is not whether property is "private" in the sense you seem to
be asking, or whether rather metaphysical notions of freedom and
consent can
exist under capitalism. Not that those are not important issues, b
11 matches
Mail list logo
