Hi Ben,
* Ben Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-10 18:20]:
>I'd make a slightly stronger statement than that: If you were
>congenitally insane, wilfully stupid or drunk, you could
>consider a source filter for this.
Depends. Additive filters that the same code can run without are
sane when used
Matisse Enzer wrote:
The trick I want is that if my code is running in a production
environment (perhaps determined at compile-time) then I want my
Devel::Assert stuff to basically disappear. So the question is, what is
the lowest-impact way to do that?
This entry in BooK's use.perl journal mi
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> This isn't an answer to your question, but in general production is the
> environment in which your code will be exposed to the data and
> conditions which have had the least testing, and to which you will have
> the least access an
On Jan 10, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I suppose you could consider a source filter, but I couldn't recommend
that.
I am in fact considering using a filter, but it scares me - perhaps
because I have never done it before.
---
Ma
By the way - I have also been looking at Test::Assertions
---
Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.matisse.net/ - http://www.eigenstate.net/
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:11:43AM -0800, Matisse Enzer wrote:
> I'd like to create a class that provides a bunch of assertion
> methods, like Carp::Assert, etc. I want to have an object oriented
> interface, so in some code I'm developing I would have:
>
>
> use Devel::Assert;
> my $tes
I'd like to create a class that provides a bunch of assertion
methods, like Carp::Assert, etc. I want to have an object oriented
interface, so in some code I'm developing I would have:
use Devel::Assert;
my $tester = Devel::Assert->new( on_fail => carp ); # or on_fail
=> cluck, etc.
Kirrily Robert wrote:
Does anyone else find that SKIP: { } blocks bugger up the debugger?
I'll be happily bouncing on the "n" key to get to round about the
vicinity of the failing test, and then blam, it sees a skipped test and
just fast-forwards to the end.
K.
Yep
Actually, eval doe
