http://test-more.googlecode.com/files/Test-Simple-0.85_01.tar.gz
This latest release resolves a number of long outstanding issues in cmp_ok().
The biggest being this:
cmp_ok $object, '==', $number;
cmp_ok() would always stringify or numify its arguments, removing the
overloading. This mean
Shlomi,
Given what was said here and my own past statements on wanting to improve
civility, I apologize to you (and publicly!) because regardless of my opinion
of your email, I should not have copied the Perl-QA list on that. It was very
disrespectful of me.
Sincerely,
Ovid
--
Buy the book
> http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/hall_of_shame
It says "Not Found"
thanks domm
Gabor
On Thursday 23 October 2008 11:25:05 Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:37 am, chromatic wrote:
> > I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors and
> > CPAN Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public
> > humiliation isn't a vital
On Oct 23, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/hall_of_shame
That looks sorted by kwalitee and author. If we're shaming people,
author
name shouldn't be a factor. Could it be by kwalitee and most recent
release
date instead?
How about n
On Thursday 23 October 2008 06:34:41 Ovid wrote:
> That being said, why are you trying to publicly humiliate people by sending
> this information to Perl-QA? I've contacted Perl-QA to try and find a smoke
> author before, but not to "name and shame". That just seems rude.
I don't care about back
On Thu, October 23, 2008 10:37 am, chromatic wrote:
> I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors and
> CPAN
> Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public humiliation
> isn't a vital component of Kwalitee? There's prior art:
>
> http://cpants.perl.org/hig
On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:37 PM, chromatic wrote:
I don't care about backchannel communication between other authors
and CPAN
Testers, but how can you blame Shlomi for thinking that public
humiliation
isn't a vital component of Kwalitee? There's prior art:
http://cpants.perl.org/highscores/h
--- On Thu, 23/10/08, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have tested File-Find-Object without installing its
> Class::Accessor
> pre-requisite:
>
> Here is a list of prerequisites you specified and versions
> we
> managed to load:
>
> Module Na
Hi Chris!
These reports:
* http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/10/msg2472650.html
* http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2008/10/msg2473253.html
Have tested File-Find-Object without installing its Class::Accessor
pre-requisite:
# at t/01ffo.t line 9.
#
10 matches
Mail list logo