On 14 Mar 2007, at 15:45, Michael G Schwern wrote:
But we can go ahead with TH 3 now using Ovid's plan without
worrying about that.
OK. Unless anyone jumps in first I'll implement it when I get some
time from Friday onwards.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2007, at 07:29, chromatic wrote:
>> The problem is that there's no way to tell that that information
>> sent to
>> Test::Builder->diag() is diagnostic information for the tests
>> because once it
>> goes out on STDERR, it could be anything.
>
> So we seem to h
