ns, observations,
> answers) - to the same? *That's* elitist.
Fair enough to a point, but please let's not overburden the experienced
folk by also _expecting_ them to always supply "corrections, observations,
and answers".
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
.
Another route to keep in mind is spending effort working on and with
things such as perl-byacc (and maybe even the yet-to-be-written perl-lex)
that help turn simple "languages" into perl.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
me problems, it's certainly too complex. For others it might not
be.
Not all problems need be shoe-horned into the same solution box. That's
all I'm trying to say.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
then it can probably be coerced into parsing something much simpler.
So let's get on with the Perl6 parser.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, David Grove wrote:
>
> Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The issues of 'use Python' or 'use Pythonish' are a quite different
> issue.
> > I don't think anyone believes it ought to be easy to *write
