Uri Guttman wrote:
are you going to predict any new operators based on missing boxes as
mendeleev did? :)
Funny you should ask! It is clear that there is a missing "list
concatenate" operator, and that its spelling should be ~~. Alas, that
is already taken by "smart match". On the other hand,
Thanks for all the comments. I started this thing as a goof, but I can
already see that it will serve dual purposes. Presenting information
in such a form can lead people to further insights and questions.
Deborah Pickett's comments in this thread are an example. (For some
real inspiring ex
Le Thu, May 27, 2004 at 12:34:32AM +0200, le valeureux mongueur Gabriel Ebner a dit:
> Hello,
>
> Mark Lentczner wrote:
> > http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
>
> What's periodic about it?
We hope it will be periodically updated. :)
> Otherwise, _nice_ table.
indee.d
Mark Lentczner wrote:
Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current design
of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators - well
over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a few
months to get around to drawing it...
http://www.ozoneho
Hello,
Mark Lentczner wrote:
> http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
What's periodic about it?
Otherwise, _nice_ table.
Gabriel.
--
Gabriel Ebner - reverse "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Mark Lentczner wrote:
All -
Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current design
of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators - well
over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a few
months to get around to drawing it...
http://www.o
Mark Lentczner wrote:
All -
Awhile back, I saw Larry Wall give a short talk about the current design
of Perl 6. At some point he put up a list of all the operators - well
over a hundred of them! I had a sudden inspiration, but it took a few
months to get around to drawing it...
http://www.o
