On Oct 15, 2005, at 9:57 AM, David Storrs wrote:
I would suggest we avoid trying to link Perl6 with Web2.0 in
people's minds, at least at first. One of the uphill battles that
I'm really tired of fighting is convincing people that Perl is good
for more than CGIs and quick-n-dirty system a
On Oct 15, 2005, at 7:39 AM, Rutger Vos wrote:
Good idea. A fat new O'reilly tome will go some way to capturing
mind share
for perl6. Gathering ideas wiki-style is also very Web2.0. Perhaps
perl6
could be marketed as such, what with the development style -
"Perl6, the
first Web2.0 program
Good idea. A fat new O'reilly tome will go some way to capturing mind share
for perl6. Gathering ideas wiki-style is also very Web2.0. Perhaps perl6
could be marketed as such, what with the development style - "Perl6, the
first Web2.0 programming language".
In any case, if the book comes out aroun
I'd like to start by saying "DON'T PANIC! I'm not going to write a
book on Perl 6" ;-)
Luckily we have people with much more enlish-fu,
structured-thought-fu, and general get-it-done-fu... Now let's talk
a bit about them:
Today Geoff Broadwell raised a book idea for discussion on #perl6.
The res