> Speaking of which, the advantage of, say, « over << is that the former
> is _one_ character. But Y, compared to ¥, is one character only as
> well, and is even more visually distinctive with most fonts I know of,
> afaict, so is there any good reason to keep the latter as the
> "official" one?!?
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Rutger Vos wrote:
_one_ charachter. But Y, compared to ¥, is one charachter only as well,
and is even more visually distinctive with most fonts I know of, afaict,
so is there any good reason to keep the latter as the "official" one?!?
Do you even need to ask? It's beca
Speaking of which the advantage of, say, « over << is that the former
is _one_ charachter. But Y, compared to ¥, is one charachter only as
well, and is even more visually distinctive with most fonts I know of,
afaict, so is there any good reason to keep the latter as the
"official" one?!?
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Juerd wrote:
All non-ASCII operators have ASCII equivalents:
¥ Y
« <<
» >>
Speaking of which the advantage of, say, « over << is that the former is
_one_ charachter. But Y, compared to ¥, is one charachter only as well,
and is even more visually distincti
