Barry Smith wrote:
On Jun 9, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
I think its legitimate to only want some of our crap.
You only get what you use; if you only use KSP then only the KSP and
below stuff will be pulled into your program, so what is the problem?
With shared libs, you
limits, asuming you
were already using KSP.
Jed
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610
://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/4a516d89/attachment.pgp
interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/a3a30d0a/attachment.html
/attachments/20090610/8cc5f707/attachment.pgp
/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/b0f38641/attachment.pgp
before they begin their experiments
is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/fd3fcf67
The later is fine you can go with that, though it is inconsistent
with Mat (perhaps Mat should be changed :-(
On Jun 10, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Jed Brown jed at 59a2.org wrote:
Barry Smith wrote:
Go ahead. This has been on the
their experiments
lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/45fa02b4/attachment.html
-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20090610/88667aa7/attachment.pgp
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Barry Smithbsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Barry Smithbsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
Well, all you say that GMRES is not coded
Using C/C++ compiler: /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/
mpicc -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -g3
C/C++ Compiler version:
Using Fortran compiler: /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/
mpif90 -Wall -Wno-unused-variable -g
Fortran Compiler version:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
Matthew Knepley wrote:
I am not opposed to this, but it ONLY works for mpich. Is there any
generality for mpicc?
FWIW, the -show option also works for Open MPI, HP MPI, and Quadrics
MPI
(i.e. all that I've had recent contact with). The
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Barry Smithbsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
? Go ahead. This has been on the todo list for a decade.
? Remember to update dev.html with the change and change any examples that
use PCShell.
? Note you have to update the Fortran stubs for these beasts (some of the
All petsc-dev users. Next time you pull petsc-dev make sure you
pull config/BuildSystem also and rerun your configure with $
{PETSC_ARCH}/conf/reconfigure-${PETSC_ARCH}.py
As always, report any problems to petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov
Barry
What I changed. I discovered the ar flags Sq
15 matches
Mail list logo