On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Jed Brown via petsc-dev wrote:
> Please fork the repository on GitLab
> (https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/forks/new) and push your branch to the
> fork, then make a merge request. If you become a regular contributor,
> we can give you push privileges to the main repository.
The phrase Hermitian symmetric was originally an attempt to make the text
clearer, but in fact it is confusing and wrong. The phrase Hermitian
symmetric should be removed and just Hermitian used.
Real matrices are either either both symmetric and Hermitian or not
symmetric and not
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, Pierre Gosselet via petsc-dev wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am sorry, I have not understood how to migrate Push Request from
> bitbucket to gitlab.
>
> I think I need the equivalent of
> git remote set-url origin https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc.git
> applied to my development branch
Please fork the repository on GitLab
(https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/forks/new) and push your branch to the
fork, then make a merge request. If you become a regular contributor,
we can give you push privileges to the main repository.
Pierre Gosselet via petsc-dev writes:
> Dear all,
> I am
Dear all,
I am sorry, I have not understood how to migrate Push Request from
bitbucket to gitlab.
I think I need the equivalent of
git remote set-url origin https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc.git
applied to my development branch (I see that my branch's remote is
incorrect in .git/config).
Or am I
(Putting back petsc-dev on c/c)
I don’t think you are the one that needs to do the changes.
There should be clarifications from the PETSc side of things, first.
From the man page your are quoting
(https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/Mat/MATSEQSBAIJ.html
Not sure if I understand you. Do you mean that a complex SBAIJ Mat with
MAT_HERMITIAN flag can be assumed to have zero imaginary part? I don't think
so. This matrix should have real diagonal entries, but off-diagonal entries
should be allowed to have nonzero imaginary part. This is what is done
Nevermind, this is the wrong fix.
The proper fix is in PETSc. It should not error out if the matrix is also
symmetric.
Indeed, complex symmetric Hermitian => complex with no imaginary part.
Thus all operations like MatMult, MatMultHermitianTranspose, Cholesky… will
work for bs > 1, since all is
