On 09/01/2008, Hiroshi Saito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dave.
>
> Yeah, we know the user who had the same problem in the past. However, In
> Japan,
> it needed to be written by encoding of a client, and We did not want to set
> an initial
> value to UTF-8. Therefore, It is need recognized by
Hi Dave.
Yeah, we know the user who had the same problem in the past. However, In Japan,
it needed to be written by encoding of a client, and We did not want to set an initial
value to UTF-8. Therefore, It is need recognized by the warning message.
How is an attached patch proposal?
Regards,
