Hi,
Richard MICHALOWICZ a écrit :
> Im trying the PgPoolAdmin V2 beta 1 with success but i have a problem
> with charset encoding. Indeed, when i use the french translation, i have
> some bad characters in sentences with special characters like « é »
> « è » « ê » …
>
You're right. fr.lang.php w
Le jeudi 09 avril 2009 à 03:03:08, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
> [...]
> Also I'm going to give a talk at PGCon 2009 in Ottawa. I would like to
> talk about how pgpool-II tries to keep the consistency among databases.
I'll be there too. That's one of the talk I want to attend.
--
Guillaume.
http://
Le jeudi 16 juillet 2009 à 15:48:58, Leonardo Carvalho a écrit :
>Unfortunately, PgAdmin always sends this commands , trying to use
> ISO date format.
>If you discover how to fix that in PgAdmin, tell us!
>
There's no way to fix that without recompiling. But you can try the patch
attached
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 17:50:53, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Guillaume
>
> Lelarge wrote:
> > Le jeudi 16 juillet 2009 à 15:48:58, Leonardo Carvalho a écrit :
> >>Unfortunately, PgAdmin always sends this commands , trying to use
> >
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 19:06:50, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Guillaume
>
> Lelarge wrote:
> > The latter. I don't see a way to catch them all easily. I'll commit this,
> > and try to find a way to catch the others.
>
> Good
Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 10:12:37, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Guillaume
>
> Lelarge wrote:
> > Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 19:06:50, Dave Page a écrit :
> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Guillaume
> >>
> >> Lelarge wrot
Le dimanche 13 décembre 2009 à 23:44:06, Jaime Casanova a écrit :
> [...]
> I'm looking at the load balancing and seems to me like is there a way
> to broke the sync of a replication using load balancing if a do
> something stupid like:
>
> """
> create table t1(col1 date);
>
> create table t_int
Le 04/03/2010 13:41, Christophe Philemotte a écrit :
>>> There exist some diff tools:
>>> - apgdiff http://apgdiff.sourceforge.net/
>>> - pgdiff http://pgdiff.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> Those are schema-wise. I think that Arjen means data-wise.
> you're rigth, I do not know data-wise diff. In fact, I'v
Le 05/03/2010 09:45, Matthias Tief a écrit :
> Hallo,
>
> we are planning to use pgpool-II as replication solution for our
> PostgeSQL application. Currently we evaluate, whether the restriction of
> pgpool-II affect our application. In the documentation you say:
> "pgpool-II cannot process multi-
Le 05/06/2010 02:42, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
> [...]
> I just want to let you know that I have started my *first* English
> blog at: http://pgsqlpgpool.blogspot.com/.
>
> I will post articles regarding PostgreSQL and pgpool-II.
>
That's great news. I see that you already posted one article. I'm g
Le 28/07/2010 16:50, Sean Brown a écrit :
> Does PgPool have an issue with the order of results from a query being
> returned in a different order?
>
> With the ongoing issue of our cluster falling out, we just had one member
> fall
> out again and again, no error in PostgreSQLs log is recorded
Le 28/07/2010 17:16, Sean Brown a écrit :
> On Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:56:27 am you wrote:
>> Le 28/07/2010 16:50, Sean Brown a écrit :
>>> Does PgPool have an issue with the order of results from a query being
>>> returned in a different order?
>>>
>>> With the ongoing issue of our cluster fal
Le 13/08/2010 03:02, Josh Berkus a écrit :
>
>>> Hmmm. You might want to display a more user-friendly value for the
>>> user, though, no?
>>
>> Good point:-) I'm thinking about to change it for coming 3.0.
>
> Great! Might I also suggest using getopt-long for the PCP commands?
>
That's alread
Le 20/08/2010 01:49, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>> hi! i tried to compile pgpool-II 3.0 beta1 on SCO 5.0.7 , buti
>> can't find getopt.h file , i just have an getopt_.h from gnulib but
>> is not enough to compile it.
>>
>> There is a way to disable long options?
>> or
>> where can i find a
Le 20/08/2010 15:04, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 20/08/2010 01:49, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>> hi! i tried to compile pgpool-II 3.0 beta1 on SCO 5.0.7 , buti
>>> can't find getopt.h file , i just have an getopt_.h from gnulib but
>>> is not enoug
Le 21/08/2010 09:25, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>> Le 20/08/2010 15:04, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>> Le 20/08/2010 01:49, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>>> hi! i tried to compile pgpool-II 3.0 beta1 on SCO 5.0.7 , buti
>>>>> can't find getopt.h
Le 21/08/2010 18:08, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Le 21/08/2010 09:25, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>> Le 20/08/2010 15:04, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>>> Le 20/08/2010 01:49, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>>>> hi! i tried to compile pgpool-II 3.0 beta1
Le 22/08/2010 00:35, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>> Le 21/08/2010 09:25, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>> Le 20/08/2010 15:04, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>>>> Le 20/08/2010 01:49, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>>>>> hi! i tried to compile pgpool-II
Le 22/08/2010 08:36, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>> Le 22/08/2010 00:35, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>> Le 21/08/2010 09:25, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>>>>>> Le 20/08/2010 15:04, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
>>>>>>> Le 20/08/2010 01:49, Tatsuo Ishii
>>>>>>> Le 21/08/2010 09:25, Tatsuo Ishii a �crit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 20/08/2010 15:04, Guillaume Lelarge a �crit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le 20/08
Le 25/09/2010 22:36, Duncan McQueen a écrit :
> I see the new version of pgpool-II includes some support for postgres
> 9.0. I just installed the binary for postgres, but configure fails
> when trying to find libpq (since postgres is installed in /opt).
> Specifically. this fails:
>
> ./configure
Le 18/12/2010 01:47, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
> [...]
>> I did the work on pgpoolII-3.0.1's doc, by the way.
>
> In the mean time, I think Jean-Paul Argudo is translating the doc to
> French and if my memory is correct, he is trying to fix the English
> doc as well. Is it possible for you and Jean t
Hi,
Le 10/01/2011 11:28, Armin Nesiren a écrit :
> [...]
> I have problem with pgpool.log file.
> I have specify 'logdir' in pgpool.conf file
> logdir = '/var/log/pgpool'
> but, pgpool wont write any log file into it.
>
> /var/log/pgpool/ have mode 777, so everyone can write into it.
> I have try
Le 12/01/2011 09:40, Zhidong She a écrit :
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm just a little confused about master_slave_sub_mode option in
> configuration file.
> If we build a master/slave db replication and deploy pgpool on top of
> them, we need set master_slave_mode to true. It does make sence.
> But why does
Hi,
Le 12/01/2011 15:10, Sandeep Thakkar a écrit :
> [...]
> I have a primary and a standby server on different boxes and both are running
> on
> different ports. I would like to use pgpool for Streaming Replication and
> Failover. Hence, I selected Master/Slave mode with stream. Now, I have a
Le 14/01/2011 10:16, Sandeep Thakkar a écrit :
> [...]
> I'm using PG9.0 and pgpool-3.0.1 and I have setup a master and a standby
> servers. Standby server is configured for Hot Standby and Stream replication.
> I'm using pgpool in Master/Slave mode with Load balancing mode on. I would
> like
>
Le 18/01/2011 16:16, Gary Fu a écrit :
> On 01/17/11 19:45, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>> Is there a simple query (not the 'show' command) to tell if my current
>>> db connection is using pgpool ?
>> No. Why is show pool_status not good?
>
> It causes error when the connection is not using pgpool.
>
Le 18/01/2011 22:06, Gary Fu a écrit :
> On 01/18/11 15:35, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> Le 18/01/2011 16:16, Gary Fu a écrit :
>>> On 01/17/11 19:45, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>>>>> Is there a simple query (not the 'show' command) to tell if my current
&g
Le 20/01/2011 23:58, Matthew Bennett a écrit :
> I am setting up PGpool with PostgreSQL 9.0 using streaming replication. I want
> to use PGpool to load balance between the live database and the hot-standby.
> The
> two Postgres servers are running on their own machines and PGpool is running
> on
Le 27/01/2011 09:49, Sandeep Thakkar a écrit :
> I was just testing the pgpool with one primary and one standby on the same
> box.
> Hot Standby, Streaming replication, load balancing, all are working fine.
> But, I
> see that failover is not happening when I shut down my primary server. When I
Le 27/01/2011 13:06, Sandeep Thakkar a écrit :
> Here, both the dbservers and pgpool run on the single box. This may not be
> the
> practical scenario, but I was just testing the features.
> Hence, I directly used touch. Is it fine then?
>
If the user has the right to create such a file, yes. I
Le 03/02/2011 10:02, Bharath Keshav a écrit :
> I am getting the following error when I try to run Pgpool. I am trying to
> use postgresql 9.0 hot streaming and then load balancing capability of
> Pgpool. However, I am stuck with a shmem_exit after the loading
> of "/usr/local/etc/pool_hba.conf", a
Le 03/02/2011 16:52, Michal Slocinski a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> I'm pgpool newbie trying to setup cluster of two PostgreSQL servers.
>
> I configureed pgpool.conf as follows:
>
> # $Header: /cvsroot/pgpool/pgpool-II/pgpool.conf.sample-replication,v
> 1.11 2010/09/01 04:58:47 kitagawa Exp $
> listen_ad
Le 07/02/2011 09:35, Wouter D'Haeseleer a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> Just an enhancement question.
> I have noticed that you need to keep a list of blacklisted functions in case
> one of the functions does a write to the db.
>
> Maybe it's a good idea to tackle this in an automated way.
> Since if yo
Le 08/02/2011 13:26, Micka a écrit :
> I would like to know if it is preferable to use postgreSQL 9 or Postgresql
> 8.3.8 ?
>
> Postgresql 8.3.8 is described in the tutorial.
>
9.0. Why use a two years old release...
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
__
Le 21/02/2011 18:36, Micka a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand on how to use the pcp command, but it doesn't work
> see :
>
> mickael@PTI2:/var/log/pgpool$ pcp_node_count 10 localhost 9898 postgres
> pgpoolAdmin
> AuthorizationError
>
> And
> sudo nano /usr/local/etc/pcp.conf
>
>
Le 21/02/2011 19:59, Stephen Sugden a écrit :
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am trying to configure pgpool-II to load balance queries and provide
> failover for 2 (or more) identical backend servers. The application that
> will access pgpool only does SELECT queries. The back end servers are
> written t
Le 22/02/2011 09:52, Micka a écrit :
> by the way :
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 www-data root 722 2010-11-12 06:45 failover.sh
> -rw-r--r-- 1 www-data root 982 2011-02-21 18:31 pcp.conf
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 858 2011-02-22 09:08 pcp.conf.sample
> -rw-r--r-- 1 www-data root 9532 2011-02-22 04:59 pgp
Le 22/02/2011 10:58, Micka a écrit :
> Thanks,
>
> " Depends if you told pgpool where to find it. How did you launch pgPool? "
>
> pgPool is not launching yet.
>
> Because i'm following this tutorial :
>
> http://pgpool.projects.postgresql.org/contrib_docs/simple_sr_setting/index.html
>
> I sh
Le 23/02/2011 22:58, Micka a écrit :
> I tried to test the pcp command myself :
>
> mickael@PTI2:/usr/local/bin$ psql -U postgres
> psql (9.0.3)
> Type "help" for help.
>
> postgres=# ALTER USER postgres WITH PASSWORD 'toto';
> ALTER ROLE
> postgres=# \q
> mickael@PTI2:/usr/local/bin$ pcp_recover
Le 24/02/2011 18:17, Micka a écrit :
> Yes it was, Thx !
>
> Now the replication functionnality work well !
>
> but when the main database server goes down I got :
>
> 2011-02-24 18:06:42 DEBUG: pid 1313: starting health checking
> 2011-02-24 18:06:42 DEBUG: pid 1313: health_check: 0 th DB node
Le 15/03/2011 14:08, Sandeep Thakkar a écrit :
> I think, the default path should be the relative path from where the binary
> exists. So, it should be "../etc/pgpool.conf". Can we do it? We use pgpool-II
> 3.0.3 sources.
>
Why don't you use the -f option to specify your configuration file loca
Le 17/03/2011 11:53, Gnanakumar a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Our production server is running PostgreSQL v8.2.3 and pgpool-II-v2.0.1.
>
> We're planning to upgrade PostgreSQL to the latest version 9.0.3. My
> question is, is it possible/compatible to run pgpool-II v.2.0.1 with
> PostgreSQL v9.0.3?
>
Do
Le 20/03/2011 10:44, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit :
>> I'm new to pgpool and to this list. I'm trying to set up a load
>> balancing cluster using pgpool-II 3.0 and slony. So far it seems to
>> work as expected, except for one key aspect: it seems as it is not
>> implemeted the lag check for slony, only for
Le 22/03/2011 15:25, Armin Nesiren a écrit :
> I have problem reading from slave node values that is indexed with hash
> index.
>
> Does pgpool replicate hash indexes? Is there any special configuration for
> hash index?
>
If you use pgpool replication system, you should have no issue with hash
Le 22/03/2011 16:59, Armin Nesiren a écrit :
> But, what am I doing wrong then.
> When I insert something in master node, and after that take select, I see my
> record.
>
> On slave, when using index I can not see exact record, and without using
> index, record is there.
> I have configured stream
Le 31/03/2011 02:03, Sean Tegtmeyer a écrit :
> Hi all,
>In both master-slave mode and replication mode, pgpool-II is only running
> on one box, correct?
If you only run pgpool on one box, yes, correct.
> Therefore pgpool-II does not provide
> a fail-over solution in the case that the box ru
Le 31/03/2011 09:40, Micka a écrit :
> My idea was, and I didn't test it, it's:
>
> Server 1Server 2
> postgres 9 A postgres9 B
> pgpool A pgpool B
> application A application B
>
> The idea was :
>
> - pgpool A is active, it's doing a streaming rep
Le 01/04/2011 03:45, Sean Tegtmeyer a écrit :
> Hi all,
> When adding in a new slave node to a running database cluster using
> pgpool-II w/Postgres9.0 SR, we would need to add a new *"**backend_hostname"
> *to the pgpool.conf, correct? Then would it be necessary to restart
> pgpool-II as the
Le 01/04/2011 08:06, Karl Lehenbauer a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We have slony replication running with a 4 node cluster and we have been
> using pgpool-II for a long time, to load balance certain queries.
>
> Now we are preparing to migrate to PostgreSQL 9.0. Currently, one of our
> slony slaves is
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 12:52 -0400, Paul Giblock wrote:
> Any help with this?
>
Before putting pgpool in the middle of this, did you install master and
slave as recommended on
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/warm-standby.html ?
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 10:53 +0200, Mario Splivalo wrote:
> I have set up logdir in pgpool.conf, but no logging ever takes place
> there. It seem that the only way pgpool is logging stuff is to stdout
> (where I can redirect it to file, pipe it to logger process, etc).
> I even set debug to 1 in .
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 16:18 +0200, Mario Splivalo wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 01:51 PM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 10:53 +0200, Mario Splivalo wrote:
> >> I have set up logdir in pgpool.conf, but no logging ever takes place
> >> there. It seem that the
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:27 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Tatsuo,
> >
> > Currently the recovery routine is called on the current master database,
> > and the parameters passed to it do not include the master database IP
> > address or hostname. Given that the way to provision a node with 9.1
>
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:29 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 13:27 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >> > Tatsuo,
> >> >
> >> > Currently the recovery routine is called on the current master database,
> >> > and the parameters passed to it do not include the master database IP
> >>
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 10:41 +0200, David Hartveld wrote:
> Op 21-07-11 08:16, Toshihiro Kitagawa schreef:
> > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:58:45 -0400
> > Matt Solnit wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone. I'm trying to understand why load balancing doesn't work
> >> with the PostgreSQL JDBC driver, and what (i
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 18:02 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> From: Guillaume Lelarge
> Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] We really need a change to the API for calling
> recovery
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:07:46 +0200
> Message-ID: <1311235666.2018.11.camel@laptop>
>
> &g
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 08:38 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >
> >> >> Because newly added node is likely to have out of sync databases. Thus
> >> >> bringing it online immediately will allow user to use obsolete
> >> >> databases. You should
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 00:17 -0400, Matt Solnit wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2011, at 10:37 PM, Matthew Solnit wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone. I'm using pgpool-II 3.0.4 with PostgreSQL 9.0.2, in streaming
> > replication mode. We've had
> > a couple of cases where pgpool-II got a network timeout while performi
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 11:17 -0400, Johnny Tan wrote:
> Thanks Tatsuo.
>
> I originally started with that (num_init_children=16), but then when
> all connections were used, even though they were idle, new connections
> would hang forever.
Sure, it's normal behaviour for pgPool. The pooling is done
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:12 -0400, Johnny Tan wrote:
> >> I originally started with that (num_init_children=16), but then when
> >> all connections were used, even though they were idle, new connections
> >> would hang forever.
> >
> > Sure, it's normal behaviour for pgPool. The pooling is done in
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 16:59 +0200, Micka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've two server : A & B.
>
> In the Server A, I've the table 1 and 3
> In the Server B, I've the table 2 and 4.
>
> I would like to know if the server A can replicate the table 1 and 3 to the
> server B.
> And the server B can replicat
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 10:39 +0200, Olivier NOEL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I compiled and installed pgpool 3.1 on Debian Wheezy yesterday. No
> compile errors.
>
> But I have a LOT of errors :
>
> Oct 4 10:09:48 pgpool01 pgpool: 2011-10-04 10:09:48 ERROR: pid 1198:
> Child process 7712 was terminated by
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 14:36 +0200, Olivier NOEL wrote:
> 2011/10/4 Olivier NOEL :
> > 2011/10/4 Olivier NOEL :
> >
> >>> The conf file you're using is a 3.0 one. I hope you don't use that for
> >>> 3.1, as it may not work at all.
> >>
> >> The conf file is essentially the same, no real differences,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:38 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to be able to have a primary/standby PostgreSQL setup with
> streaming replication and using pgPool to deal with the load balancing
> and auto failover. One question I have is can I have 2 instances of
> pgPool pointing to the
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:13 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 5 October 2011 10:05, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:38 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> >[...]
> >> This seems like it should be a very common setup, so does pgPool have
> >> provisi
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 12:22 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:13 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> > On 5 October 2011 10:05, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 09:38 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> > >[...]
> > >> This seem
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:44 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 5 October 2011 11:40, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 12:22 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:13 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> > On 5 October 2011 10:05, Gu
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 14:36 +0200, Armin Nesiren wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm experiencing performance issues with pgpool-3.1
> Problem is that when I connect through pgpool to database, database works
> slower than
> when I connect directly to master. In this test case, I have disabled node2,
>
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 14:56 +0200, Armin Nesiren wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 14:36 +0200, Armin Nesiren wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm experiencing performance issu
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 16:28 +0200, Olivier NOEL wrote:
> 2011/10/6 Guillaume Lelarge :
> > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 14:56 +0200, Armin Nesiren wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, 2011-10-06
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 10:59 -0500, Matias Israel Malpica Escobar wrote:
> Hi everyone i´ve been trying to understand and configure pgpool for a pool of
> connections (not sure if that is the term), i already follow a manual and
> confiigure it like this:
>
> listen_addresses = '*'
> port =
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:27 +0200, Olivier NOEL wrote:
> 2011/10/6 Guillaume Lelarge :
>
> [...]
>
> >> And it's not. Ok, there is some overhead, but it's veeery slow.
> >>
> >
> > How did you check that?
> >
> > You may be righ
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 11:13 -0500, Matias Israel Malpica Escobar wrote:
> Hi thanks for your answers, what i wanted to say about the connections and
> errors from pgpool was that, for what i understand postgres returns an error
> if the number of connections are higher than its maximum, and pgpoo
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 18:44 +0200, Olivier NOEL wrote:
> 2011/10/6 Guillaume Lelarge :
> > On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:27 +0200, Olivier NOEL wrote:
> >> 2011/10/6 Guillaume Lelarge :
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> >> An
ich does not update the node
> status when reattaching the node in raw mode(Guillaume Lelarge)"
>
Don't know about the others, but the one you're referring to is fixed on
both releases.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
_
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 13:40 -0430, Lazaro Rubén García Martinez wrote:
> Tatsuo, thank you very much for your answer, but when I execute:
>
> cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@cvs.pgfoundry.org:/cvsroot/pgpool login
>
> This error is shown:
>
> cvs [login aborted]: connect to [cvs.pgfoundry.org]:2401 fa
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 01:27 -0800, Sandeep Thakkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Why one more release of pgpool-II 3.0 series when we have pgpool-II
> 3.1 series released already? We were using pgpool-II 3.0.3 and then
> updated to 3.1. Now, you have released 3.0.5. Which one should we use
> for production?
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 08:13 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Thank you very much for the answer.
> > Is there a plan for using sr_check_password in the next release of pgpool
> > 3.1 series?
>
> Yes, it's in my plan. Unless supporting sr_check_password is too
> invasive...
Sorry, but I disagree. E
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 18:31 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 08:13 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >> > Thank you very much for the answer.
> >> > Is there a plan for using sr_check_password in the next release of
> >> > pgpool 3.1 series?
> >>
> >> Yes, it's in my plan. Unless s
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 17:24 -0430, Lazaro Rubén García Martinez wrote:
> I think this feature is very important, because having trust acces in
> pg_hba.conf is not a good idea.
I understand that and I agree with you. The problem is not on the
feature itself, but on which release it should be del
81 matches
Mail list logo
