Hallo,
we are planning to use pgpool-II as replication solution for our
PostgeSQL application. Currently we evaluate, whether the restriction of
pgpool-II affect our application. In the documentation you say:
"pgpool-II cannot process multi-statement query." What do you exactly
mean with "multi-s
Le 05/03/2010 09:45, Matthias Tief a écrit :
> Hallo,
>
> we are planning to use pgpool-II as replication solution for our
> PostgeSQL application. Currently we evaluate, whether the restriction of
> pgpool-II affect our application. In the documentation you say:
> "pgpool-II cannot process multi-
Thank you for your rapid answer.
But for me it is still not clear. What you describe seems to be a
collection of statements transmitted as a single transaction. But this
is done very well by pgpool-II in my tests. I am wrong with that?
So than my question is: What is the difference between "mult
-general@pgfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Multi-statement queries
>
> Thank you for your rapid answer.
>
> But for me it is still not clear. What you describe seems to be a
> collection of statements transmitted as a single transaction. But this
> is done very we
Yeah I'm with Daniel on this one, Tatsuo?
--- On Tue, 9/3/10, daniel.cre...@l-3com.com wrote:
> From: daniel.cre...@l-3com.com
> Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Multi-statement queries
> To: "Matthias Tief" , pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org
> Date: Tuesday, 9 March, 201
> boun...@pgfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthias Tief
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:11 AM
> > To: pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org
> > Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Multi-statement queries
> >
> > Thank you for your rapid answer.
> >
> > But for me it is
directly to
> > PostgreSQL.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: pgpool-general-boun...@pgfoundry.org
> > [mailto:pgpool-general-
> > > boun...@pgfoundry.org]
> > On Behalf Of Matthias Tief
> > > Sent:
p://www.sraoss.co.jp
> Regards.
>
>
> 2010/3/9 Glyn Astill
>
> > Yeah I'm with Daniel on this one, Tatsuo?
> >
> > --- On Tue, 9/3/10, daniel.cre...@l-3com.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: daniel.cre...@l-3com.com
> > &g
Ah, I see.
--- On Wed, 10/3/10, Cesar Martin wrote:
> From: Cesar Martin
> Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Multi-statement queries
> To: "Glyn Astill"
> Cc: "Matthias Tief" , pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org,
> daniel.cre...@l-3com.com
> Date: Wednesday, 10 Ma
wrote:
From: daniel.cre...@l-3com.com
Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Multi-statement queries
To: "Matthias Tief" ,
pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org
Date: Tuesday, 9 March, 2010, 14:50
My experience is also that
multi-statement queries ("statement1; statement2; ...;
statementN;") w
art...@gmail.com; glynast...@yahoo.co.uk; Crespo, Daniel @ SDS;
> pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Multi-statement queries
>
> Hi,
>
> As I understand one can avoid this problem by setting replicate_select
> =
> true, right? But than one will have almost no
pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Multi-statement queries
Hi,
As I understand one can avoid this problem by setting replicate_select
=
true, right? But than one will have almost no load balancing anymore.
Matthias
Tatsuo Ishii schrieb:
Hello there,
My experience is that, the pro
12 matches
Mail list logo
