On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Schmidt, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, what I'm interested in is the comparison between 7.0x and 7.1x.
> > Shouldn't the 7.1b4 database be faster? Have you (or anyone else) done this
> > comparison?
>
> 7.1 is considerably faster if you
"Schmidt, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, what I'm interested in is the comparison between 7.0x and 7.1x.
> Shouldn't the 7.1b4 database be faster? Have you (or anyone else) done this
> comparison?
7.1 is considerably faster if you compare performance without -F.
If you are comparin
Title: RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance
How
closely matched are the parameters of your 7.0 and 7.1 servers? Particularly the
-B parameters. Anyway, I'm busy trying to get my server set up with
both version to run the tests. I'll get back to you...
-Original
Message-From: Schmi
Title: RE: [ADMIN] perfomance question
You might try pooling your database connections, for a start. You don't say anywhere that you are doing this.
Cheers...
MikeA
-Original Message-
From: Nikolay Mijaylov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 February 2001 10:23
To: [EMAIL PR
Hi all,
I have a large site currently hosted at following machine:
Linux 2
64MB RAM, 2x100 MB Swap
Apache 1.3.X ( 120 connections, 2 min )
PHP 3.0.18 installed as CGI binary
MySQL ( 150 connections)
sitename: http://picof.com/nmmm
The site have too many visitors and all the pages are
Title: RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance
I'm using a test
machine that is even less powerful than what you are using. However, what I'm
interested in is the comparison between 7.0x and 7.1x. Shouldn't the 7.1b4
database be faster? Have you (or anyone else) done this
comparison?
Also, I'm no
