Re: [BUGS] BUG #5325: Timestamp w/ timezone + interval not functioning correctly

2010-02-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Eric Vollnogel" writes: > The output in this example is incorrect. Well, that's debatable. As you say, the result of the subtraction is interval -- 44 days 23:00:00 (1 row) If we add 44 days to timestamp1, we get select cast('2010-03-01 00:00:00' AS timestamp witho

[BUGS] BUG #5325: Timestamp w/ timezone + interval not functioning correctly

2010-02-12 Thread Eric Vollnogel
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5325 Logged by: Eric Vollnogel Email address: edvollno...@dstsystems.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4.2 Operating system: Windows XP Description:Timestamp w/ timezone + interval not functioning correctly Details: I

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5324: Server not starting

2010-02-12 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:45 PM, sourabh bansal wrote: > > The following bug has been logged online: > > Bug reference:      5324 > Logged by:          sourabh bansal > Email address:      sourabh.k.ban...@gmail.com > PostgreSQL version: 8.4 > Operating system:   windows XP SP2 > Description:    

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5323: plperl and plperlu interaction segfaults

2010-02-12 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Alexey Klyukin >>> wrote: > I think this might be the same problem previously discussed h

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5323: plperl and plperlu interaction segfaults

2010-02-12 Thread Alexey Klyukin
On Feb 12, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Alexey Klyukin >> wrote: I think this might be the same problem previously discussed here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-01/msg0