Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

Hi, On 2019-01-26 10:06:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > > The one "caveat" I will bring up is that once pushed and applied to the > > site, we would bring introduce a lot of 404s into the website. > > Hm. In principle we could probably insert some redirects, but > I dou

Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

"Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > On 2/4/19 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Just for the record, this change causes the time to build HEAD's >> HTML documentation to drop from ~120 sec to ~95 sec for me; the >> size of the resulting html/ directory drops from 21MB to 15MB, >> while the PDF output goes fro

Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

On 2/4/19 5:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: >> On 2/4/19 4:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> After a bit more thought, I'm inclined to propose that the policy be >>> that we *don't* update the surviving back branches for branch retirement. > >> ...so I guess in turn, we would not upd

Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

"Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > On 2/4/19 4:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> After a bit more thought, I'm inclined to propose that the policy be >> that we *don't* update the surviving back branches for branch retirement. > ...so I guess in turn, we would not update back branches with newer > releases as

Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

On 2/4/19 4:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: >> On 2/4/19 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> It's not quite clear to me what the policy would be for removing >>> back-branch links from this list when old versions drop out of support. >>> Should we go back and remove them in surviving

Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

"Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > On 2/4/19 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> It's not quite clear to me what the policy would be for removing >> back-branch links from this list when old versions drop out of support. >> Should we go back and remove them in surviving back branches, or just >> change HEAD?

Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

On 2/4/19 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: >> On 1/26/19 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> If I haven't heard objections, I'll see about making this happen >>> during the first week of Feb (after the CF closes, but before >>> it's time to do the February releases' notes). > >> T

Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal

"Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > On 1/26/19 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> If I haven't heard objections, I'll see about making this happen >> during the first week of Feb (after the CF closes, but before >> it's time to do the February releases' notes). > Thank you! I was hoping to take a crack at doi

Re: .pgpass

Thanks Daniel ＿ 🙏 🙏 🙏 [ Have a blessed day! ] 🙏 🙏 🙏🙏 💻 My Profile 💻 Andres Leon-Rangel 📲 +64 027-498-1162 𝄗 On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 23:02, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 10 Jan 2019, at 04:45, PG Doc comments fo