OK, I see. The REFERENCES clause added to a column definition is a short
cut if you only have one column as the foreign key, similar to the PRIMARY
KEY clause, which you can add to a single column, but if you want a
multi-column primary key, then you have to do it at the end.
Thanks, Tom.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 22:30:48 +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
When will 7.1 leave beta (roughly)?
From what I've been reading on the lists, "soon". I suspect within the next
month or two.
How stable is it? FWIW, I'll be using it for development, not production
I've not tested it extensively
El Mi 17 Ene 2001 15:49, Gareth Cantrell escribi:
Hi:
I've been trying in vain for over 5 hours now to compile
PostgreSQL 7.0.3 on Solaris 7 (2.7).
I keep getting the following error:
ld -G -o libpq++.so.3.1 pgconnection.o pgdatabase.o pgtransdb.o
pgcursordb.o pglobject.o
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you confirm that it is OK now? Your email from October 18th below
seems to indicate it is not correct. Can I get a diff against the
current CVS source that I can apply? Thanks. Sorry for the confusion.
It wasn't okay before I left to Kenya on
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:46:11PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
Have you added the required lines to /etc/syslog.conf? (Yes, I know I
haven't thoroughly documented that. Working on it.).
It _is_ documented in the archives -- do a search on '/etc/syslog.conf'.
Ah, no I hadn't, thanks. I'd
Agree 100%
-Original Message-
From: Philip Hallstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January 2001 10:05
To: PostgreSQL General
Subject: Why is there so much MySQL bashing???
What are my impressions going to be of PostgreSQL (and now Great Bridge
since their name will pop up as
Hi
I'm sure it has been already discused milion times
but i can't find it from list archives.
Whats the syntax for inserting and quering tables
with nested tables.
For example:
CREATE TABLEfoo (attr1 int2, attr2
int2);
CREATE TABLE foo1 (idint4, name
text,attr1 foo);
Now, how can i
Title: referential integrity
Please could someone help me my database does not have referential integrity. I want to be able to delete a primary key in one table and for it to delete anything relating to it below ( same with update).
i.e table product primary key product_name
table
Hi.
I have a big problem with postgres because I need to know how I can see the
relations among the table like foreign-key.
It' s possible use some commands or graphic tool from wich I can see that
relations?
Do you know some sites where i can found more information about this!
Thank you very
I am new to PostgreSQL...
I've created a table (table1) and database user (dbuser).
dbuser has only SELECT permission on table1.
Next I created a function insert_table1 that inserts a new row into table1.
I want to give dbuser the ability to invoke the insert_table1 function
without granting
How can I make query
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_field = 'A*';
Meaning that I want to get all rows from my_table where my_field value
begins with alphabet "A"
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_field LIKE 'A%';
Should do it!
-Original Message-
From: Jorch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 5:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [GENERAL] Query question
How can I make query
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_field
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_field LIKE 'A%';
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Jorch" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:39 PM
Subject: Query question
How can I make query
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_field = 'A*';
Meaning that I
That can't be good for PostgreSQL, can it?
Neither can not being able to do rpm -Uvh and have it work first time...
Nor not finding a Dreamweaver Ultradev database connection for Postgresql
in the live data menu when there is a Mysql one...
Nor not being able to find somewhere to get a
Is there a way to tune queries?
I'm doing queries that join around 5-6 tables. All join fields are indexed
either in hash (where tables are small enough and join is done on "="), or
btree (big tables, not joined on "="). The tables have between several
hundred and several tens of millions of
Tony Grant wrote:
That can't be good for PostgreSQL, can it?
Neither can not being able to do rpm -Uvh and have it work first time...
H... When was the last time you tried?
Thanks to the 'Do No Harm' principle, it would be foolhardy to do what
has to be done to upgrade between
On 2001.01.18 17:31:29 +0100 Lamar Owen wrote:
Tony Grant wrote:
That can't be good for PostgreSQL, can it?
Neither can not being able to do rpm -Uvh and have it work first
time...
H... When was the last time you tried?
Yesterday...
The RedHat 6.2 rpms are broken if
"Peeter Smitt" wrote:
I'm sure it has been already discused milion times but i can't find it from=
list archives.
Whats the syntax for inserting and quering tables with nested tables.
For example:
CREATE TABLE foo (attr1 int2, attr2 int2);
CREATE TABLE foo1 (id int4, name
"Michelle Anderson" wrote:
I get a message to screen that says
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/FOREIGN KEY clause ignored; not yet implemented
You need to upgrade to PostgreSQL 7.0.3; referential inegrity is not
implemented in 6.5.3 and earlier.
--
Oliver Elphick
I am not sure if this is a bug, an oversight or something else entirely,
but it would appear that if there are two tables, Table1 and Table2, which
are joined using INNER JOIN, specifying WHERE = one of the join fields
doesn't automatically get equalised to the other field.
For example:
SELECT
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Is there a way to tune queries?
I'm doing queries that join around 5-6 tables. All join fields are indexed
either in hash (where tables are small enough and join is done on "="), or
btree (big tables, not joined on "="). The tables have between
Thanks you so much. I am sorry for the mixup. We will get it in there
ASAP when it arrives.
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can you confirm that it is OK now? Your email from October 18th below
seems to indicate it is not correct. Can I get a diff against the
current CVS
Have you tried PGAdmin? You can use this graphical tool from windows.
It's very good and it's also free!
"riccardo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:941d3q$fqm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi.
I have a big problem with postgres because I need to know how I can see
the
relations among the table
Hi to all,
I am considering to use PostgreSQL. But I need some more information about
some features:
Is there a consistency check? Online or Offline?
Thanks
Toni
Hi,
I use PostGreSQL with a Web server which receive 200 HTTP simultaneous
queries.
For each HTTP query, I have about 5 SELECT queries and 3 UPDATE ones.
Queries have been optimized, I have INDEX on my tables...
The biggest table has more than 500 000 records.
And I have big troubles,
select * from my_table where my_field like 'A%';
"Jorch" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
How can I make query
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_field = 'A*';
Meaning that I want to get all rows from my_table where my_field value
begins with
Hello,
I am going throught the pains of initdb failing again. I know that usually
this is a permissions problem but can't remember how I fixed it 18 months
ago (yes we should all have a notebook to document such things...)
I had a working 6.5.x on RedHat 6.2 and (stupidly) decided to upgrade to
I have a database and a table with 7 records (which i dont think it's
too much)
I join this table with another of about the same size and put a record
restriction (WHERE) and everything works out fine, but when I put two SUMs
over a couple of fields and add a GROUP BY I keep getting this
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:21:01PM +0100, Fausto Guzzetti wrote:
Hello,
I have what I think is a trivial problem. But I wasn't able to find a solution
in the FAQ or in the docs I have.
It has to do with case sensitivity. I am working with an application of
PostrreSQL (7.02) and PHP4.
hi all,
Does postgres support other character sets?
We've been thinking in porting an application to chinesse, but we don't
know if it's possible to store chinesse characters in postgres
I don't know what kind of Chinese are talking about, but PostgreSQL
does support both tradional Chinese
"mike" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom thanks for the heads up on the bug earlier, thngs worked much better ui=
ng the currnet snapshot, though fomr some reason initdb seems to do its job=
though its not creating database template1.
That's an interesting definition of "doing its job" :-(.
How
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_field LIKE 'A%';
--rob
- Original Message -
From: "Jorch" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 12:39 PM
Subject: Query question
How can I make query
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_field = 'A*';
Meaning that I
Konstantinos Agouros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way in postgres to make use of the extra cpu(s) the
machine has for the single tasks of importing the data and doing the
somewhat intensive selects that result from the sheer amount of data.
Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems
Barry Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dllwrap -o plpgsql.dll --dllname plpgsql.dll --def
plpgsql.def pl_parse.o pl_handler.o pl_comp.o pl_exec.o pl_funcs.o
../../../../src/utils/dllinit.o -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib
-L../../../../src/backend
-lpostgres -lcygipc -lcygwin -lcrypt
Does this bug still exist?
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
Louis-David Mitterrand writes:
When creating a child (through CREATE TABLE ... INHERIT (parent)) it
seems the child gets all of the parent's contraints _except_ its PRIMARY
KEY. Is this normal?
It's kind of
Read the docs on "exists" that should be what you are looking for.
--rob
- Original Message -
From: "Diehl, Jeffrey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Diehl, Jeffrey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 3:42 PM
Subject: Help with query. (*)
36 matches
Mail list logo