On Monday, September 24, 2012 8:19 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com writes:
Below test results into Loop:
[ AFTER INSERT trigger does another insert into its target table ]
Well, of course. The INSERT results in scheduling another AFTER event.
I understand
On 09/24/2012 06:40 PM, David Johnston wrote:
Server parameter: server_version_num
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/runtime-config-preset.html
To elaborate:
test= SELECT current_setting('server_version_num');
current_setting
-
90009
And yes, I know it needs
Aha, exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!
Well I certainly feel dumb. The answer is right in the documentation, I just
failed to find it (I did look first). The system-wide psqlrc, and the ~/.psqlrc
files fit the bill perfectly, and the documentation explains it all quite
nicely. I
On 09/24/2012 08:27 PM, ichBinRene wrote:
Hello everybody and thanks for your attention.
I have this function:
###
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION check_current_xlog() RETURNS text
AS
$$
import subprocess
p =
How would one go about building a multi-column unique constraint where null
is a significant value, eg. (1, NULL) (2, NULL)?
I see a number of references to not being able to use an index for this,
but no mention of an alternative. Any pointers would be appreciated
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:05:15AM -0500, Mike Blackwell wrote:
How would one go about building a multi-column unique constraint where null
is a significant value, eg. (1, NULL) (2, NULL)?
I see a number of references to not being able to use an index for this,
but no mention of an
-Original Message-
From: Daniele Varrazzo [mailto:daniele.varra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:26 AM
To: Adrian Klaver
Cc: David Johnston; Robert James; Igor Neyman; Postgres General
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Running CREATE only on certain Postgres versions
On
My version: PostgreSQL v9.1.5
Version string: PostgreSQL 9.1.5 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by
gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973], 64-bit
Basically my question is:
Is there currently any way to avoid wal generation during data load for
given tables and then have
Interesting, but that assumes there's a value to use in the coalesce that
isn't a valid data value.
__
*Mike Blackwell | Technical Analyst, Distribution Services/Rollout
Management | RR Donnelley*
1750 Wallace Ave |
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:34:36AM -0500, Mike Blackwell wrote:
Interesting, but that assumes there's a value to use in the coalesce that
isn't a valid data value.
no, it doesn't.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
Hi,
We have a bit strange error with pljava deploy and postgresql 9.2.1...
We are not sure is it related to pljava itself, because of when we add to
postgresql.conf:
custom_variable_classes = 'pljava'
we cant start Postgres any more...
server log says;
LOG: unrecognized configuration
Misa Simic misa.si...@gmail.com writes:
We have a bit strange error with pljava deploy and postgresql 9.2.1...
We are not sure is it related to pljava itself, because of when we add to
postgresql.conf:
custom_variable_classes = 'pljava'
we cant start Postgres any more...
Thanks Tom,
without custom_variable_classes = 'pljava'
but with pljava.classpath = pathTopljava.jar
everything works fine..
Many thanks,
Misa
2012/9/25 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Misa Simic misa.si...@gmail.com writes:
We have a bit strange error with pljava deploy and postgresql
On 09/25/2012 05:05 PM, Mike Blackwell wrote:
How would one go about building a multi-column unique constraint where
null is a significant value, eg. (1, NULL) (2, NULL)?
I see a number of references to not being able to use an index for
this, but no mention of an alternative. Any pointers
I want to run a query like to_tsquery(A | B | C) and then rank the
results so that if a document contained A, B, and C, then it would
rank above a document that just had some subset.
How would I do such a thing?
--
W. Matthew Wilson
m...@tplus1.com
http://tplus1.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general
Le 2012-09-25 à 14:16, W. Matthew Wilson a écrit :
I want to run a query like to_tsquery(A | B | C) and then rank the
results so that if a document contained A, B, and C, then it would
rank above a document that just had some subset.
How would I do such a thing?
Hi everyone,
I have a problem that I've been struggling with for quite some time. Every
once in a while I will get a connection that goes to idle in transaction on an
in-house programmed application that connects with JDBC. That happens fairly
regularly and the programmers are trying to
On 09/25/12 12:23 PM, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
I have a problem that I've been struggling with for quite some time.
Every once in a while I will get a connection that goes to idle in
transaction on an in-house programmed application that connects with
JDBC. That happens fairly regularly and
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:53 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] idle in transaction query makes server unresponsive
If you're easily able to do it, (i.e. you're building rather than receiving
the query), you could rank them by the conjunction of the search terms
first:
ORDER BY ts_rank(vector, to_tsquery('A B C')) desc, ts_rank(vector,
to_tsquery('A | B | C')) desc
Or just explicitly order by whether the
On 09/25/12 1:35 PM, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
The problem is how do I investigate this when PG is entirely unresponsive? Why
is it becoming unresponsive, and how do I prevent the PG server from becoming
unresponsive?
I think I'd push that 9.1.latest upgrade ASAP, and then see if this
problem
Scot Kreienkamp wrote on 25.09.2012 22:35:
The application is using a pooler and generally runs around 100
connections, but I've seen it as high as 200 during the day for
normal use. It's on a large server; 64 cores total and about 500
gigs of memory. That's one of the reasons I left it at 512
Folks,
Apologies for the long post but I want to put in as much detail as possible
I just upgraded from 8.4.1 to 8.4.13 on my laptop (Vista 32 bit) and the
installation seemed to go fine. However, when I try and start the
windows service I get an error message, after a minute or so, saying:
Hi
Thanks for your answer.
I understood that the server is ok memory wise.
What can I check on the client side or the DB queries?
Thank u.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Shiran Kleiderman shira...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Shiran Kleiderman shira...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using and Amazon ec2 instance with the following spec and the
application that I'm running uses a postgres DB 9.1.
The app has 3 main cron jobs.
Ubuntu 12, High-Memory Extra Large Instance
17.1 GB of
Hi,
Basically my question is:
Is there currently any way to avoid wal generation during data load for given
tables and then have point in time recovery after that?
Please have a look at unlogged and temporary options here -
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-createtable.html
I don't
But some other databases like Oracle handles the scenario reported but not
loop.
To handle for After triggers, there is mutation table concept in Oracle due
to which it errors out
and for Before triggers, it errors out with maximum number of recursive SQL
levels(50) exceeded.
Oracle uses
Is it the case that extensions can be added to only one schema? If so, what is
the recommended practice for accessing a function from an extension in multiple
schemas?
Is it *ok* to load the extension in the pg_catalog schema so functions can be
accessed by unqualified names? Is it *better*
28 matches
Mail list logo
