On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 10:04 -0500, Joe Abbate wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 12:06 AM, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> > I think that makes, and will make sense. Because SQL/MED standard
> > mentions about schema for only foreign table in "4.12 SQL-schemas" section.
> >
> > FYI, pgAdmin III shows them as a tree
On 03/08/2012 12:06 AM, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> I think that makes, and will make sense. Because SQL/MED standard
> mentions about schema for only foreign table in "4.12 SQL-schemas" section.
>
> FYI, pgAdmin III shows them as a tree like:
>
> Database
> FDW
> Server
> User Mapping
>
(2012/03/08 6:16), Joe Abbate wrote:
> Does that make sense? And if so, will it make sense in the future
> (considering potential FDW developments)?
I think that makes, and will make sense. Because SQL/MED standard
mentions about schema for only foreign table in "4.12 SQL-schemas" section.
FYI,
Hi,
We've been discussing the subject in the pyrseas-general ML, but I think
it would be beneficial to get feedback from a broader audience.
The Pyrseas dbtoyaml utility outputs the objects in YAML, which ends up
looking like a tree (see
http://pyrseas.readthedocs.org/en/latest/dbtoyaml.html ) an
