Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

Greg Smith wrote: >On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Rainer Bauer wrote: > >> The way I read this section is that linking to a GPL ODBC driver would imply >> that I have to release my program under a GPL (compatible) licence. > >What you actually link against is the ODBC implementation for your >platform. If

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

Rainer Bauer wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Rainer Bauer wrote: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" wrote: On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 PM, Rainer Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's nice to hear. But I respect licences as they are and the ODBCng driver is licenced under the GPL.

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Rainer Bauer wrote: The way I read this section is that linking to a GPL ODBC driver would imply that I have to release my program under a GPL (compatible) licence. What you actually link against is the ODBC implementation for your platform. If you're on something UNIX-i

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

Alvaro Herrera wrote: >Rainer Bauer wrote: >> "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" wrote: >> >> >On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 PM, Rainer Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> That's nice to hear. But I respect licences as they are and the ODBCng >> >> driver >> >> is licenced under the GPL. >> >That doesn't mean th

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

Rainer Bauer wrote: > "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" wrote: > > >On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 PM, Rainer Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> That's nice to hear. But I respect licences as they are and the ODBCng > >> driver > >> is licenced under the GPL. > >That doesn't mean that you're not allowed to use it

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

"Andrej Ricnik-Bay" wrote: >On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 PM, Rainer Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That's nice to hear. But I respect licences as they are and the ODBCng driver >> is licenced under the GPL. >That doesn't mean that you're not allowed to use it with commercial >applications; it just

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

Thanks. I have tried your program. But it seems that it has trouble with EUC_CN. It returns unrecoginzed value of empty columns. BTW: I've solved this problem. Every one using odbc on windows shuold read this mail: psqlODBC with Visual Studio 2005 and Connection Pooling for newbies

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

On Nov 7, 2007 2:40 PM, Rainer Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's nice to hear. But I respect licences as they are and the ODBCng driver > is licenced under the GPL. That doesn't mean that you're not allowed to use it with commercial applications; it just means that you need to be happy to

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 02:40:08 +0100 Rainer Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's nice to hear. But I respect licences as they are and the > ODBCng driver is licenced under the GPL. > > So is this an _official_ statement from CommandPrompt that

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

"Joshua D. Drake" wrote: >> psqlodbc is licenced under LGPL, but ODBCng uses the GPL. >> >> That means that commercial software cannot use the ODBCng driver. Are >> there any plans to release it under LGPL licence? > >The only time this would be an issue is if you tried to embed the >driver. Othe

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:03:52 +0100 Rainer Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > >FYI there's another Postgres ODBC driver that is said to have better > >performance. > > > >https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng > > >

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

Alvaro Herrera wrote: >FYI there's another Postgres ODBC driver that is said to have better >performance. > >https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng > >(Yes, my company maintains it) psqlodbc is licenced under LGPL, but ODBCng uses the GPL. That means that commercial software cannot use

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

? wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently I found my C/S program becomes slow. So I analysed the tcp > traffic between my program and the Postgresql database. I found there > are occasionally tcp re-transmission and that's why my porgram slow > down. > > But when I changed to npsql, the tcp traf

Re: [GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

I've never used Npsql and I'm not a C# developer (so take this response with more than a few grains of salt) but from what I remember reading somewhere, Npsql implements postgres protocols natively, with the protocol handling done directly in C# and getting the raw data without going throug

[GENERAL] Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?

Hi all, Recently I found my C/S program becomes slow. So I analysed the tcp traffic between my program and the Postgresql database. I found there are occasionally tcp re-transmission and that's why my porgram slow down. But when I changed to npsql, the tcp traffic was cut off to only 1/4 and t