Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql vs. aggregates

2004-06-10 Thread Nick Barr
Hi, - Original Message - From: "Richard Huxton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:03 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql vs. aggregates

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql vs. aggregates

2004-06-10 Thread Richard Huxton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But that raises an interesting idea. Suppose that instead of one summary row, I had, let's say, 1000. When my application creates an object, I choose one summary row at random (or round-robin) and update it. So now, instead of one row with many versions, I have 1000 with 1

Re: [GENERAL] Postgresql vs. aggregates

2004-06-09 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'd find all this much easier to reason about if I understood how > the versions of a row are organized and accessed. How does postgresql > locate the correct version of a row? It doesn't, particularly. A seqscan will of course visit all the versions of a row, and an i