[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > huh? all i do is './configure;make;make install' ...
>
> And what about CVS?
Have you changed the CVSROOT since it was changed between 7.0.0 and
7.0.2?
My nightly CVS mirrors have worked perfectly for a long time -- that is,
once I got the CVSROOT change properly d
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:40:27PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Graeme Merrall wrote:
>
> >
> > > Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
> > > number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's
> > > easier to install,
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Lamar Owen wrote:
> And, if most people's experience with the RedHat 5.2 RPM's is what
> they're going on, they need to get with the program -- RH 5.2 shipped
> PostgreSQL *6.3.2* which is absolutely ancient. Although, at the time,
> 6.3.2 was better than nothing.
Hello Lam
"Prasanth A. Kumar" wrote:
>
> Travis Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
> > 5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
> > with it and realized that there were a number of things that
Travis Bauer wrote:
>
> Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
> 5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
> with it and realized that there were a number of things that had to be
> done before it would work: creating the postgre
Travis Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
> 5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
> with it and realized that there were a number of things that had to be
> done before it would work: c
Once I ran into a guy who said that the postgres rpm was broken in Red Hat
5.2. This was when I was first getting into postgres. I spent some time
with it and realized that there were a number of things that had to be
done before it would work: creating the postgres users, initializing the
datab
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 12:24:20AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
> number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's
> easier to install, and that PostgreSQL is difficult ("a pain") to install.
I've no
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > J.R. Belding wrote:
> >
> > #mysql has much more activity than does #postgresql, and since I prefer
> > this method of communication over mailing-lists, I found this to be very
> > much in MySQL's favor.
>
>
> Hmm. So which server do most postgresql p
Bruce Momjian writes:
> OK, thanks to the www.phpbuilder.com PostgreSQL/MySQL comparison, there
> is another PostgreSQL/MySQL thread on shashdot.org. Looks interesting,
> and of course, we are looking good too.
Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
number of peop
> P.S. My tolerance is negligible for anything that goes "beep" the way
> mysql insists on doing when giving error messages. Like anyone needs
> that when they're trying to figure out SQL syntax! Having to figure
> out SQL syntax is pennance enough, surely ...
MySQL beeps at you on an error. E
>
>
> Does anyone know what you have to do to get anything on slashdot? When
> v6.5 and v6.5.1 was released, I posted something to Slashdot announcing
> it, especially considering that the new MVCC code added by Vadim...
To get anything on /. you need to have a very big stick and live close
to
Does anyone know what you have to do to get anything on slashdot? When
v6.5 and v6.5.1 was released, I posted something to Slashdot announcing
it, especially considering that the new MVCC code added by Vadim...
I just did a look around Slashdot, and the newest thing is a notice about
v6.3, whic
13 matches
Mail list logo
