Re: [GENERAL] contributing patches

2008-03-11 Thread Robert Haas
I have to dig this up and see if I still have it. ...Robert -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:05 PM To: Robert Haas Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] contributing patches Great, would you

Re: [GENERAL] contributing patches

2008-03-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Great, would you please end your truncate patch to the patches email list? Thanks. --- Robert Haas wrote: > > We require that all submissions conform to the Postgres BSD license, > > but we are not picky about requiring pap

Re: [GENERAL] contributing patches

2008-03-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert, would you email us the patch? Thanks. --- Robert Haas wrote: > > We require that all submissions conform to the Postgres BSD license, > > but we are not picky about requiring paperwork to prove it. Just put > > the

Re: [GENERAL] contributing patches

2007-04-22 Thread Robert Haas
> We require that all submissions conform to the Postgres BSD license, > but we are not picky about requiring paperwork to prove it. Just put > the same copyright header into any added files as you see in existing > files. OK cool. > Yeah, the core team does not have a lot of bandwidth right now

Re: [GENERAL] contributing patches

2007-04-22 Thread Tom Lane
"Robert Haas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. Does the PostgreSQL development team require the assignment of > copyright in order to accept contributions? If so, is there a standard > form that is normally used for this purpose? Or, alternatively, do I > need to provide something that says that

[GENERAL] contributing patches

2007-04-22 Thread Robert Haas
These may be more -hackers questions, but I am duly following protocol by trying elsewhere first. 1. Does the PostgreSQL development team require the assignment of copyright in order to accept contributions? If so, is there a standard form that is normally used for this purpose? Or, alternativel