Re: [GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-06 Thread Daniel Schuchardt
Alban Hertroys schrieb: another example?: RAISE NOTICE "error during validation % :", 'ks:"'||ks||'"@"'||loopdate||'"'; (here LoopDate is a DateTime) Ehm... What's wrong with RAISE NOTICE "error during validation ks:"%"@"%" :', ks, loopdate; ? (I don't quite understand the purpose of that

Re: [GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-06 Thread Daniel Schuchardt
Klint Gore schrieb: > RAISE NOTICE "error during validation % :", 'ks:"'||ks||'"@"'||loopdate||'"'; (here LoopDate is a DateTime) You know you can use more than one % in a raise and it will take care of the data types? yes i know. the real code looks like this: S:='another ABG found on ks

Re: [GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-05 Thread Alban Hertroys
another example?: RAISE NOTICE "error during validation % :", 'ks:"'||ks||'"@"'|| loopdate||'"'; (here LoopDate is a DateTime) Ehm... What's wrong with RAISE NOTICE "error during validation ks:"%"@"%" :', ks, loopdate; ? (I don't quite understand the purpose of that colon at the end, btw)

Re: [GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-05 Thread Klint Gore
Daniel Schuchardt wrote: Tino Wildenhain schrieb: RETURN extract(year FROM $1)*100+extract(month FROM $1)-1; was too clean and easy? ;)) Looks like a good oportunity to clean up your code before anything unexpected happens :-) Cheers T. LOL. Yes I don't like such easy things :-P > RAISE

Re: [GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-05 Thread Daniel Schuchardt
Tino Wildenhain schrieb: RETURN extract(year FROM $1)*100+extract(month FROM $1)-1; was too clean and easy? ;)) Looks like a good oportunity to clean up your code before anything unexpected happens :-) Cheers T. LOL. Yes I don't like such easy things :-P But you see i have a function so

Re: [GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-05 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Daniel Schuchardt wrote: Tino Wildenhain schrieb: Hi, Daniel Schuchardt wrote: ... in 81: postgres=# SELECT 1::INTEGER||1::INTEGER; ?column? -- 11 (1 row) *shudder* is this actually a port of an application originally targeted at M*Sql? ;) Are you using those columns somewhere with

Re: [GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-05 Thread Daniel Schuchardt
Tino Wildenhain schrieb: Hi, Daniel Schuchardt wrote: ... in 81: postgres=# SELECT 1::INTEGER||1::INTEGER; ?column? -- 11 (1 row) *shudder* is this actually a port of an application originally targeted at M*Sql? ;) Are you using those columns somewhere with their real type - as inte

Re: [GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-05 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Hi, Daniel Schuchardt wrote: ... in 81: postgres=# SELECT 1::INTEGER||1::INTEGER; ?column? -- 11 (1 row) *shudder* is this actually a port of an application originally targeted at M*Sql? ;) Are you using those columns somewhere with their real type - as integer? I mean if you use the

[GENERAL] operator is not unique: integer || integer

2008-05-05 Thread Daniel Schuchardt
yeah, its clear that an upgrade from 8.1 to 8.3 is impossible for us without a major relase. there are to many changes so the whole project has to be rechecked. another example: in 83: postgres=# SELECT 1::INTEGER||1::INTEGER; ERROR: operator does not exist: integer || integer at character 18