Thanks.. I'll keep those issues in mind.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >> Well, you'd have to start by demonstrating the benefit of it. The
> >> advantage of query caches in proxies and clients is well-known, because
> you
> >> can offload some of the work of the datab
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> Billy,
>
> > I've done a brief search of the postgresql mail archives, and I've
> > noticed a few projects for adding query caches to postgresql, (for
> > example, Masanori Yamazaki's query cache proposal for GSOC 2011),
>
> ... which was co
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The complication, opportunities for bugs, and general slowdown
> > associated with that would outweigh any possible gain, in the opinion
> > of most hackers who have thought about this.
>
>
r the experts out there, does this seem reasonable, or am I
misunderstanding the source code? Anyone aware of a project trying to
accomplish this?
Thanks!
Billy Earney
Tom,
Thanks for your reply. So is the group leaning towards just maintaining
the current regex code base, or looking into introducing a new library
(RE2, PCRE, etc)? Or is this still open for discussion?
Thanks!
Billy
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Billy Earney wri
Jay,
Good links, and I've also looked at a few others with benchmarks. I
believe most of the benchmarks are done before PCRE implemented jit. I
haven't found a benchmark with jit enabled, so I'm not sure if it will make
a difference. Also I'm not sure how accurately the benchmarks will show
how
pcre
library? It seems to have a lot of neat features, and also has a jit, and
it looks like it is being actively maintained and has decent comments.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Billy Earney writes:
> > I did a google search, and found the following:
> > ht
e. I didn't
download and analyze their code, but maybe they have made some comments
that could help, or maybe have some improvements to the code..
Just a thought.. :)
Billy Earney
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brendan Jurd writes:
> > Are you far enough into th