Updated patch with documentation of the new option.
--
Martín Marquéshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>From ede201ed96d41d799dc3c83dfab1cdcc03e5ced4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Mart=C3=ADn=20Marqu=C3=A9s?=
Date:
Hi,
Some time ago I had to work on a system where I was cloning a standby
using pg_basebackup, that didn't have screen or tmux. For that reason I
redirected the output to a file and ran it with nohup.
I normally (always actually ;) ) run pg_basebackup with --progress and
--verbose so I can follow
El Mar 04 May 2004 01:50, Christopher Kings-Lynne escribió:
> > I installed postgresql 7.4 in my computer, I'm using
> > redhat 9.0 .
> > I installed pgadmin III but I can't to conecct to the
> > server.
> >
> > The port 5432 is not open.
>
> You need to set tcpip_socket = true in your postgresql.c
El Tuesday 27 April 2004 10:27, Bruce Momjian escribió:
> Here are features that are being worked on, hopefully for 7.5:
>
> o tablespaces (Gavin)
> o nested transactions (Alvaro)
> o two-phase commit (Heikki Linnakangas)
> o integrated pg_autovacuum (O'Connor)
> o
El Mié 14 Abr 2004 22:22, Christopher Kings-Lynne escribió:
> > ... on projects.postgresql.org, or similar.They really aren't doing
> > any good in /contrib.
> >
> > I've already set up a category "conversion tools" on pgFoundry, and my
> > idea was one project per target system.
>
> I reckon t
El Mié 07 Abr 2004 06:28, Fabien COELHO escribió:
> > > > =? as != is a synonum for <>, it would make sense.
> > >
> > > That was never such a terribly good idea, IMHO.
> >
> > Agreed. Compilers should give errors and not try to work around bad code.
>
> Is it bad code? Not for people who come from
El Lun 01 Mar 2004 11:11, ivan escribió:
> hi,
>
> is there same packets (or sources to compile) only for client-systems
> ( headers and libs like libpq, and so on) ?
On a normal Linux distribution, you would have packages like this:
postgresql - PostgreSQL client programs and libraries.
postgres
Mensaje citado por David Garamond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>From the Firebird FAQ:
> >
> > "The first beta was released on January 29, 2003. We are hoping to be
> > close to a full release some time around Easter 2003."
> >
> > They are at RC8 right now ... running a *we
Mensaje citado por ow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Is this all that's planned for 7.5? (based on current TODO list)
>
> -Change factorial to return a numeric (Gavin)
> -COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT | LANGUAGE ]
> (Christopher)
> -Have psql \dn show only visibl
Mensaje citado por "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Native Win32 is planned for it (whether it makes it or not is another
> question, but it is the goal) ...
Replication wasn't another BIG one?
--
select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email;
---
Quoting Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Martin Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Look deeper into what Christopher said and use casting to get the right
> > output:
> > prueba=> select now()::timestamp(0);
>
> There's also "current_time
El Sáb 03 Ene 2004 18:20, ivan escribió:
> ok, bat each time where i want to do select .. a nie tu use to_char,
> but it should be in function timestamp_out to convert time to string
> it would be easer and faster.
Look deeper into what Christopher said and use casting to get the right
output:
p
El Sáb 27 Dic 2003 16:08, Nailah Ogeer escribió:
> How do you connect to postgres if it is running on a different machine. I
> am looking for a telnet command in place of postmaster -D data
Depends on what you want to do.
One way arounf would be:
1) Edit the pg_hba.conf where the PG server is run
On Vie 14 Feb 2003 09:52, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, once we have PITR, will anyone want incremental backups?
I will probably not need it, but I know of people how have databases which
build dumps of more then 20GB.
They are interested in live incremental backups.
--
Porqué usar una base de dat
On Jue 13 Feb 2003 16:38, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Patrick Macdonald wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Someone at Red Hat is working on point-in-time recovery, also known as
> > > incremental backups.
> >
> > PITR and incremental backup are different beasts. PITR deals with a
> > backup + logs.
How's this issue going on the 7.4 development tree?
I saw it on the TODO list, but didn't find much on the archives of this
mailing list.
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-
Martín Mar
16 matches
Mail list logo
