Re: [HACKERS] [Mingw-users] mingw64

2011-02-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 09:14:03AM CET: Den 2011-02-12 11:10 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: * Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:26:24PM CET: Or is plain 'ar' used somewhere instead of 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-ar'? Automake outputs 'AR = ar' in Makefile.in for

Re: [HACKERS] [Mingw-users] mingw64

2011-02-13 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 02/12/2011 05:10 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello, and sorry for the delay, * Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:26:24PM CET: Or is plain 'ar' used somewhere instead of 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-ar'? Automake outputs 'AR = ar' in Makefile.in for rules creating old libraries iff

Re: [HACKERS] [Mingw-users] mingw64

2011-02-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, and sorry for the delay, * Peter Rosin wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:26:24PM CET: Or is plain 'ar' used somewhere instead of 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-ar'? Automake outputs 'AR = ar' in Makefile.in for rules creating old libraries iff neither AC_PROG_LIBTOOL nor another method to define AR

Re: [HACKERS] [Mingw-users] mingw64

2011-01-29 Thread Peter Rosin
Maybe that's true. But Windows doesn't come wth zic nor a timezone database like Unix usually has. Part of the reason we started maintaining our own timezone sets was that we needed it on Windows. And since we do mke rovision for that, jumping through these hoops seems silly. I'm much more

Re: [HACKERS] [Mingw-users] mingw64

2011-01-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 01/29/2011 08:26 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: Maybe that's true. But Windows doesn't come wth zic nor a timezone database like Unix usually has. Part of the reason we started maintaining our own timezone sets was that we needed it on Windows. And since we do mke rovision for that, jumping through