Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> If you like I can send a patch that adds it to all of contrib and some
> of the other places required so that make check passes...
Think I got them all already:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-05/msg00384.php
but if you see any I missed...
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:21:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> I'm pretty sure we had agreed that magic blocks should be
> > required;
> > >> otherwise this check will accomplish little.
> >
> > > Sure, I just didn't want to break every module in one
> > weekend.
> > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:21:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm pretty sure we had agreed that magic blocks should be
> required;
> >> otherwise this check will accomplish little.
>
> > Sure, I just didn't want to break every module in one
> weekend. I was
> > thinking of adding it with
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:20:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that the magic-block patch is in, we need to revisit this bit of the
> discussion. I'm for making lack of a magic block an ERROR immediately.
> I don't see the point of waiting; in fact, if we wait till freeze we'll
> just make the br
Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:21:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure we had agreed that magic blocks should be required;
>> otherwise this check will accomplish little.
> Sure, I just didn't want to break every module in one weekend. I was
> thinking of ad
