Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Win32 BYTE_ORDER

2006-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Done, but I think you forgot the defs for LITTLE_ENDIAN and >> friends ... it seems unlikely that a platform would provide >> those and then forget BYTE_ORDER. > Well, it compiled just fine, so it must've found it somewhere :-) I think the #if te

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Win32 BYTE_ORDER

2006-10-19 Thread Magnus Hagander
> > This patch adds a #define for BYTE_ORDER to win32.h if it's > not pulled > > in elsewhere, as needed by msvc build of pgcrypto. Seems > several other > > platforms define it in their port file already, but not win32. > > Done, but I think you forgot the defs for LITTLE_ENDIAN and > friend

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Win32 BYTE_ORDER

2006-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch adds a #define for BYTE_ORDER to win32.h if it's not pulled > in elsewhere, as needed by msvc build of pgcrypto. Seems several other > platforms define it in their port file already, but not win32. Done, but I think you forgot the defs for