Re: [HACKERS] Foreign servers and user mappings versus the extensions patch

2011-02-07 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Robert Haas writes: > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Currently, the extensions patch considers that foreign data wrappers, >> foreign servers, and user mapping objects can all be parts of extensions. >> This is slightly problematic for pg_dump, where somebody decided to take >

Re: [HACKERS] Foreign servers and user mappings versus the extensions patch

2011-02-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Currently, the extensions patch considers that foreign data wrappers, > foreign servers, and user mapping objects can all be parts of extensions. > This is slightly problematic for pg_dump, where somebody decided to take > a shortcut and not implem

[HACKERS] Foreign servers and user mappings versus the extensions patch

2011-02-05 Thread Tom Lane
Currently, the extensions patch considers that foreign data wrappers, foreign servers, and user mapping objects can all be parts of extensions. This is slightly problematic for pg_dump, where somebody decided to take a shortcut and not implement user mappings using the full DumpableObject infrastru