Re: [HACKERS] Libpq async issues

2001-01-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010124 10:27] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010124 07:58] wrote: > >> I have added this email to TODO.detail and a mention in the TODO list. > > > The bug mentioned here is long gone, > > Au contrair

Re: [HACKERS] Libpq async issues

2001-01-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010124 07:58] wrote: > > I have added this email to TODO.detail and a mention in the TODO list. The bug mentioned here is long gone, however the problem with issuing non-blocking COPY commands is still present (8k limit on buffer size). I hope to get to fix

Re: [HACKERS] Libpq async issues

2001-01-24 Thread Tom Lane
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010124 07:58] wrote: >> I have added this email to TODO.detail and a mention in the TODO list. > The bug mentioned here is long gone, Au contraire, the misdesign is still there. The nonblock-mode code will *neve

[HACKERS] Libpq async issues

2001-01-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added this email to TODO.detail and a mention in the TODO list. > >> Um, I didn't have any trouble at all reproducing Patrick's complaint. > >> pg_dump any moderately large table (I used tenk1 from the regress > >> database) and try to load the script with psql. Kaboom. > > > This is af