On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
>
>> Besides accuracy, there is a thornier problem here that has to do with
>> hot standby (although the use case is replication more generally) when
>> one has heterogeneously sized database
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> Besides accuracy, there is a thornier problem here that has to do with
> hot standby (although the use case is replication more generally) when
> one has heterogeneously sized database resources. As-is, it is
> required that locking-related s
Hello List,
I'd like to share with you some experiences we've had while
investigating what we'd have to do to make very-very tiny databases.
First, the formulae at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html#SHARED-MEMORY-PARAMETERS
(17-2) seem misleading, particularly with re
