On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 12/02/2014 12:52 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> Gotta say, I’m thrilled to see movement on this front, and especially
>> pleased to see how consensus seems to be building around an abstracted
>> interface to keep options open. This platfo
On 12/02/2014 12:52 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Gotta say, I’m thrilled to see movement on this front, and especially pleased
> to see how consensus seems to be building around an abstracted interface to
> keep options open. This platform-specific example really highlights the need
> for it (I
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:43:28AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In light of the recent discussions about using ICU on OS X, I looked
> into the Core Foundation locale functions (Core Foundation = traditional
> Mac API in OS X, as opposed to the Unix/POSIX APIs).
>
> Attached is a proof of conc
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> At the moment, this is probably just an experiment that shows where
> refactoring and better abstractions might be suitable if we want to
> support multiple locale libraries. If we want to pursue ICU, I think
> this could be a useful thir
On Nov 28, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> At the moment, this is probably just an experiment that shows where
> refactoring and better abstractions might be suitable if we want to
> support multiple locale libraries. If we want to pursue ICU, I think
> this could be a useful third
In light of the recent discussions about using ICU on OS X, I looked
into the Core Foundation locale functions (Core Foundation = traditional
Mac API in OS X, as opposed to the Unix/POSIX APIs).
Attached is a proof of concept patch that just about works for the
sorting aspects. (The ctype aspects
