On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 01:18:24PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:29:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
The attached patch fixes this.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:29:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
The attached patch fixes this. This should prevent the warning.
Surely that's just going to
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:50:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute
-Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard
-g
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:50:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
The attached patch fixes this. This should prevent the warning.
Surely that's just going to move the errors somewhere else. The call
site still expects the argument to be int[].
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:29:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
I think this is caused because the variable is not defined as SOCKET.
The attached patch fixes this. This should prevent the warning.
Surely that's just going to move the errors somewhere
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute
-Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
c:/mingw/msys/1.0/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.5100/../pgsql/contrib/pg_stat_statements/pg_stat_statements.c:
In function 'pgss_ProcessUtility':
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The best alternative I can think of is to use strncmp() to check for
whether the head of the string matches COPY , and then perform the
integer conversion using strtoull() #ifdef HAVE_STRTOULL and strtoul()
otherwise.
What
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The best alternative I can think of is to use strncmp() to check for
whether the head of the string matches COPY , and then perform the
integer conversion using strtoull()
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/15/2014 04:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Ok, I committed #undefs. I don't have a Mingw(-w64) environment to test
with, so let's see if the buildfarm likes it.
There does not
On 05/14/2014 06:06 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:51:24PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/14/2014 05:37 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:15:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
MinGW:
On 05/15/2014 04:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Ok, I committed #undefs. I don't have a Mingw(-w64) environment to test
with, so let's see if the buildfarm likes it.
There does not seem to be a buildfarm machine
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:14:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
I'm pretty sure we need this on Mingw - this SYSTEMQUOTE stuff dates
back well before 8.3, IIRC, which is when we first got full MSVC support.
I
On 05/14/2014 08:15 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:14:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
I'm pretty sure we need this on Mingw - this SYSTEMQUOTE stuff dates
back well before 8.3, IIRC,
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:15:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
MinGW:
http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/mingw-org-wsl/ci/master/tree/include/stdio.h#l467
MinGW-w64:
On 05/14/2014 05:37 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:15:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
MinGW:
http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/mingw-org-wsl/ci/master/tree/include/stdio.h#l467
MinGW-w64:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:51:24PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/14/2014 05:37 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 03:15:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 05/09/2014 02:56 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
MinGW:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:14:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
I'm pretty sure we need this on Mingw - this SYSTEMQUOTE stuff dates
back well before 8.3, IIRC, which is when we first got full MSVC support.
I tried googling for some info on this, and
19 matches
Mail list logo
