Re: [HACKERS] Shared library versions

2001-05-09 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: We did not bump the shared library versions before the 7.1 release. Maybe we should do this before 7.1.2 goes out. Ummm ... unless there are any changes that would require someone to recompile their apps between v7.1.1 and v7.1.2, I don't think so

Re: [HACKERS] Shared library versions

2001-05-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We did not bump the shared library versions before the 7.1 release. Maybe we should do this before 7.1.2 goes out. I thought I did that long ago for 7.1, or I should have anyway. I don't see the commits either. Seems we can't do it in a minor

Re: [HACKERS] Shared library versions

2001-05-09 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: We did not bump the shared library versions before the 7.1 release. Maybe we should do this before 7.1.2 goes out. I thought I did that long ago for 7.1, or I should have anyway. I don't see the commits either. Seems we can't do it in a minor

Re: [HACKERS] Shared library versions

2001-05-09 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Hermit Hacker writes: IMHO, it should only be changed if there are incompatibilities between releases ... we modify the API, mainly ... anything more then that, and we're making ppl recompile to pull in libraries that only unlying code has

Re: [HACKERS] Shared library versions

2001-05-09 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: I'm talking about the minor number. The only thing that effects is that executables would pick up the new version if they have the old one in the path as well, no potential problems. Okay, but, what does that buy you? One overwrites the old