Re: [HACKERS] comments tablecmds.c

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote: > On 2016-12-27 10:25, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> >> Applied, thanks. >> >> Seems to me that in comments it's not worth chasing them down >>

Re: [HACKERS] comments tablecmds.c

On 2016-12-27 10:25, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote: Applied, thanks. Seems to me that in comments it's not worth chasing them down individually, but if you happen to fix one alongside another one like here, then it's a different

Re: [HACKERS] comments tablecmds.c

On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote: > On 2016-12-25 13:38, Erik Rijkers wrote: > >> 'the the' -> 'the' >> >> and >> >> 'ie' -> 'i.e.' >> >> Although (concening the latter change) the present counts are 'ie' >> 428, and 'i.e.' 428. >> so it might be debatable (but

Re: [HACKERS] comments tablecmds.c

On 2016-12-25 13:38, Erik Rijkers wrote: 'the the' -> 'the' and 'ie' -> 'i.e.' Although (concening the latter change) the present counts are 'ie' 428, and 'i.e.' 428. so it might be debatable (but let's not) Sorry; I meant: 'ie' 428, and 'i.e.' 305. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing

[HACKERS] comments tablecmds.c

'the the' -> 'the' and 'ie' -> 'i.e.' Although (concening the latter change) the present counts are 'ie' 428, and 'i.e.' 428. so it might be debatable (but let's not) thanks, Erik Rijkers --- src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c.orig 2016-12-25 13:29:28.715237491 +0100 +++