Hey All,
I goofed with the patch I submitted last year for adding 'week' capability to
the date_trunc function.
Attached is a patch against HEAD for your review.
Cheers,
Rob
--
11:00:49 up 47 days, 16:17, 4 users, load average: 3.01, 2.37, 2.37
Linux 2.6.5-02 #8 SMP Mon Jul 12 21:34:44
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:12:32AM -0700, Robert Creager wrote:
Hey All,
I goofed with the patch I submitted last year for adding 'week' capability to
the date_trunc function.
Attached is a patch against HEAD for your review.
It has this comment in it:
/*
When grilled further on (Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:40:02 +0100),
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] confessed:
Attached is a patch against HEAD for your review.
It has this comment in it:
/* the new year cannot be greater than the
*
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:48:00PM -0700, Robert Creager wrote:
When grilled further on (Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:40:02 +0100),
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] confessed:
Attached is a patch against HEAD for your review.
It has this comment in it:
/* the new
OK. I believe the following function provides the correct functionality.
Agree/disagree? If it's good, I'll figure out how to convert this little
monster to C...
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
date_trunc_week(timestamp without time zone)
RETURNS timestamp without time zone
AS '
DECLARE
