> > So we need some good error numbering scheme. Any ideas?
>
> SQL9x specifies some error codes, with no particular numbering scheme
> other than negative numbers indicate a problem afaicr.
>
> Shouldn't we map to those where possible?
Yes, it defines at least a few dozen char(5) error codes
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:
> > SQL9x specifies some error codes, with no particular numbering scheme
> > other than negative numbers indicate a problem afaicr.
> >
> > Shouldn't we map to those where possible?
>
> Yes, it defines at least a few dozen char(5) error codes. These are hierarchica
t;>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 3/20/01, 10:53:42 AM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: More on elog and error codes:
> Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes:
> > >
